Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26280117›Full record

Trial reportNeurosurgery2015

Elevated Baseline C-Reactive Protein as a Predictor of Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Data From the Simvastatin in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (STASH) Trial.

Carole L Turner, Karol Budohoski, Christopher Smith, Peter J Hutchinson, Peter J Kirkpatrick, G D Murray, STASH collaborators

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurosurgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carole L TurnerAcademic Division of Neurosurgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Karol Budohoski
Christopher Smith
Peter J Hutchinson
Peter J Kirkpatrick
G D Murray
STASH collaborators
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBBoston Biomedical (United States) · US

Funding

British Heart Foundation SP/08/003/24065Department of Health NIHR-RP-R3-12-013Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere remains a proportion of patients with unfavorable outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, of particular relevance in those who present with a good clinical grade. A forewarning of those at risk provides an opportunity towards more intensive monitoring, investigation, and prophylactic treatment prior to the clinical manifestation of advancing cerebral injury.

objectiveTo assess whether biochemical markers sampled in the first days after the initial hemorrhage can predict poor outcome.

methodsAll patients recruited to the multicenter Simvastatin in Aneurysmal Hemorrhage Trial (STASH) were included. Baseline biochemical profiles were taken between time of ictus and day 4 post ictus. The t-test compared outcomes, and a backwards stepwise binary logistic regression was used to determine the factors providing independent prediction of an unfavorable outcome.

resultsBaseline biochemical data were obtained in approximately 91% of cases from 803 patients. On admission, 73% of patients were good grade (World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grades 1 or 2); however, 84% had a Fisher grade 3 or 4 on computed tomographic scan. For patients presenting with good grade on admission, higher levels of C-reactive protein, glucose, and white blood cells and lower levels of hematocrit, albumin, and hemoglobin were associated with poor outcome at discharge. C-reactive protein was found to be an independent predictor of outcome for patients presenting in good grade.

conclusionEarly recording of C-reactive protein may prove useful in detecting those good grade patients who are at greater risk of clinical deterioration and poor outcome.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsSimvastatinStatistics as TopicSubarachnoid HemorrhageTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinSimvastatin

Identifiers

PMID26280117
PMCPMC4605277
OpenAlexW2414527188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.