Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26279997›Full record

ArticleEuropean thyroid journal2015

Incidence and Significance of Incidental Focal Thyroid Uptake on (18)F-FDG PET Study in a Large Patient Cohort: Retrospective Single-Centre Experience in the United Kingdom.

Kanhaiyalal Agrawal, James Weaver, Fahim Ul-Hassan, Jean-Pierre Jeannon, Ricard Simo, Paul Carroll, Johnathan G Hubbard, Ashish Chandra, Hosahalli Krishnamurthy Mohan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European thyroid journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Focal Thyroid Incidentalomas onFrontiers in endocrinology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. An Exceptional Cause of IncreasedDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Diffusely increasedPostgraduate medical journal · 2022
    Article
  4. Prevalence of incidental thyroid malignancy on routineEuropean journal of hybrid imaging · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kanhaiyalal AgrawalDepartments of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
James WeaverDepartments of King's College London, London, UK.
Fahim Ul-HassanDepartments of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK ; Departments of Clinical PET Centre, King's College London, UK.
Jean-Pierre JeannonDepartments of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ricard SimoDepartments of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Paul CarrollDepartments of Consultant Endocrinologist, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Johnathan G HubbardDepartments of Consultant Endocrine Surgeon, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ashish ChandraDepartments of Histopathology/Cytology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Hosahalli Krishnamurthy MohanDepartments of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK ; Departments of Clinical PET Centre, King's College London, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the prevalence and pathological nature of incidental focal thyroid uptake on (18)F-FDG (2-[(18)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose) PET (positron emission tomography) and examine the role of the maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) to differentiate benign from malignant thyroid pathology. MATERIAL AND

methods(18)F-FDG PET reports were retrospectively reviewed. Incidental focal tracer uptake in the thyroid was noted in 147 patients (0.5%). Patients with known primary thyroid malignancy were excluded. The final diagnosis was made following ultrasonography of the neck, fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or histopathology of the surgically resected specimen where surgery was indicated. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the SUVmax of benign and malignant thyroid pathology. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify an SUVmax cutoff in differentiating benign from malignant pathology.

resultsA final diagnosis was achieved in 47/147 (32%) of the patients. The diagnoses included benign lesions in 36 patients and malignancy in 9 patients. In 2 patients, FNAC demonstrated indeterminate follicular lesions; however, surgical excision was not performed. There was a highly significant difference in the mean SUVmax of malignant focal thyroid uptake (15.7 ± 5.9) compared to that of benign lesions (7.1 ± 6.8) with a p value of 0.000123. An SUVmax of 9.1 achieved a sensitivity of 81.6%, specificity of 100% and area under the curve of 0.915 in the ROC analysis differentiating benign from malignant disease.

conclusionThe malignancy potential of incidental focal thyroid uptake remains high and warrants prompt and appropriate follow-up by the clinician. The SUVmax may aid in further characterisation of the lesion and its management.

Indexed as

18F-FDGPETThyroidUptake

Identifiers

PMID26279997
PMCPMC4521059
OpenAlexW1545785741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.