Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26279963›Full record

ArticleHawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health2015

Improving the Utilization of Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cytology Co-testing for Cervical Cancer Screening in an Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident Clinic.

Kurt Yoshino, Maxine Karimoto, Christina Marzo, Bliss Kaneshiro, Mark Hiraoka

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kurt YoshinoUniversity of Hawai'i John A. Burns School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Honolulu, HI.
Maxine KarimotoUniversity of Hawai'i John A. Burns School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Honolulu, HI.
Christina MarzoUniversity of Hawai'i John A. Burns School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Honolulu, HI.
Bliss KaneshiroUniversity of Hawai'i John A. Burns School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Honolulu, HI.
Mark HiraokaUniversity of Hawai'i John A. Burns School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Honolulu, HI.
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing in combination with cervical cytology (HPV co-testing) has been recommended for cervical cancer screening for women 30 to 65 years of age. In several studies, HPV co-testing increased sensitivity for detecting high grade dysplasia and resulted in cost-savings. This retrospective cohort study assessed the prevalence of HPV co-testing in an obstetrics and gynecology resident clinic before and after a brief educational intervention which was designed to reinforce current cervical cancer screening recommendations. The intervention consisted of a short presentation that was given to all residents and medical assistants in October 2011. The proportion of women age 30-65 years of age who had cervical cancer screening with HPV co-testing as compared to cervical cytology alone was compared before and after the intervention using chi-square tests. The goal of the intervention was to increase the percentage of patients receiving co-testing from 0.5% to 7.8%. Each arm (pre- and post-intervention) required 130 subjects to achieve 80% power with a significance of P = .05. No significant differences in demographics including age, insurance type, and cytology were noted. HPV co-testing increased from 0% to 55% (P < .001). Of the 72 subjects who had co-testing, 58 (80%) will not need cervical cancer screening for another 5 years. HPV co-testing represents an underutilized cervical cancer screening modality for women 30 years and older. This brief educational intervention, adaptable to any clinical setting, significatnly increased co-testing at the clinical site.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCervix UteriCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaeRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26279963
PMCPMC4536738
OpenAlexW2418811951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.