Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26279833›Full record

ReviewBiology of sex differences2015

Sex differences in the brain: a whole body perspective.

Geert J de Vries, Nancy G Forger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology of sex differences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Human studies of mitochondrial biology demonstrate an overall lack of binary sex differences: A multivariate meta-analysis.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Vocal Fold Injury Produces Similar Biomechanical Outcomes in Male and Female Rabbits.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2024
    Article
  3. Do Sex and Gender Have Separate Identities?Archives of sexual behavior · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Teaching About Sex and Gender in Neuroscience: More Than Meets the "XY".Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Is Oxytocin "Nature's Medicine"?Pharmacological reviews · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Geert J de VriesNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 5030, Atlanta, GA 30302-5030 USA.
Nancy G ForgerNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 5030, Atlanta, GA 30302-5030 USA.

Funding

The Neural Basis of Sexually Dimorphic Brain FunctionR01MH047538 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI DE VRIES, GEERT J. · 1991 to 2013
$3.2M
Cell Death and Neural Sex DifferencesR01MH068482 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI FORGER, NANCY G · 2004 to 2013
$2.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH047538NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH068482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most writing on sexual differentiation of the mammalian brain (including our own) considers just two organs: the gonads and the brain. This perspective, which leaves out all other body parts, misleads us in several ways. First, there is accumulating evidence that all organs are sexually differentiated, and that sex differences in peripheral organs affect the brain. We demonstrate this by reviewing examples involving sex differences in muscles, adipose tissue, the liver, immune system, gut, kidneys, bladder, and placenta that affect the nervous system and behavior. The second consequence of ignoring other organs when considering neural sex differences is that we are likely to miss the fact that some brain sex differences develop to compensate for differences in the internal environment (i.e., because male and female brains operate in different bodies, sex differences are required to make output/function more similar in the two sexes). We also consider evidence that sex differences in sensory systems cause male and female brains to perceive different information about the world; the two sexes are also perceived by the world differently and therefore exposed to differences in experience via treatment by others. Although the topic of sex differences in the brain is often seen as much more emotionally charged than studies of sex differences in other organs, the dichotomy is largely false. By putting the brain firmly back in the body, sex differences in the brain are predictable and can be more completely understood.

Indexed as

Adipose tissueBladderBrainEnvironmentGutImmune systemKidneyLiverMusclePlacentaSensory systemSex difference

Identifiers

PMID26279833
PMCPMC4536872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.