ArticleSystems and synthetic biology2015
Quantification of the gene silencing performances of rationally-designed synthetic small RNAs.
Article in Systems and synthetic biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A modular RNA interference system for multiplexed gene regulation.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- CRISPR Interference Modules as Low-Burden Logic Inverters in Synthetic Circuits.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Fermentation of lactose to ethanol in cheese whey permeate and concentrated permeate by engineered Escherichia coli.BMC biotechnology · 2017Article
- Re-using biological devices: a model-aided analysis of interconnected transcriptional cascades designed from the bottom-up.Journal of biological engineering · 2017Article
- A BioBrick™-Compatible Vector for Allelic Replacement Using the XylE Gene as Selection Marker.Biological procedures online · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small RNAs (sRNAs) are genetic tools for the efficient and specific tuning of target genes expression in bacteria. Inspired by naturally occurring sRNAs, recent works proposed the use of artificial sRNAs in synthetic biology for predictable repression of the desired genes. Their potential was demonstrated in several application fields, such as metabolic engineering and bacterial physiology studies. Guidelines for the rational design of novel sRNAs have been recently proposed. According to these guidelines, in this work synthetic sRNAs were designed, constructed and quantitatively characterized in Escherichia coli. An sRNA targeting the reporter gene RFP was tested by measuring the specific gene silencing when RFP was expressed at different transcription levels, under the control of different promoters, in different strains, and in single-gene or operon architecture. The sRNA level was tuned by using plasmids maintained at different copy numbers. Results demonstrated that RFP silencing worked as expected in an sRNA and mRNA expression-dependent fashion. A mathematical model was used to support sRNA characterization and to estimate an efficiency-related parameter that can be used to compare the performance of the designed sRNA. Gene silencing was also successful when RFP was placed in a two-gene synthetic operon, while the non-target gene (GFP) in the operon was not considerably affected. Finally, silencing was evaluated for another designed sRNA targeting the endogenous lactate dehydrogenase gene. The quantitative study performed in this work elucidated interesting performance-related and context-dependent features of synthetic sRNAs that will strongly support predictable gene silencing in disparate basic or applied research studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.