Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26279675›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2015

Validation of the CogState battery for rapid neurocognitive assessment in Ugandan school age children.

Paul Bangirana, Alla Sikorskii, Bruno Giordani, Noeline Nakasujja, Michael J Boivin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Computerized Cognitive Test Batteries for Children and Adolescents-A Scoping Review of Tools For Lab- and Web-Based Settings From 2000 to 2021.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Propelling the Pediatric HIV Therapeutic Agenda With Science, Innovation, and Collaboration.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul BangiranaDepartment of Psychiatry, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Alla SikorskiiDepartment of Statistics and Probability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI USA.
Bruno GiordaniNeuropsychology Section, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA.
Noeline NakasujjaDepartment of Psychiatry, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Michael J BoivinNeuropsychology Section, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA ; Departments of Psychiatry and of Neurology and Opthalmology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI USA.
Makerere University · UGUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

Severe Malaria And Risk to The Brain (SMART Brain)R01NS055349 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Chandy C. John, Ruth Namazzi · 2008 to 2026
$11.2M
Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation in Children after Severe MalariaR01HD064416 · NICHD · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BOIVIN, MICHAEL JOSEPH, NAKASUJJA, NOELINE · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD064416NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCogState is a widely used computer-based cognitive test whose validity has not been addressed in resource poor settings. We examined the construct, concurrent and convergent validity of CogState, test-retest reliability and the effect of sociodemographic variables on CogState outcomes in school age children.

methodsTwo hundred and thirty Ugandan children (54% male) with mean age 6.99 years (SD = 1.67, range 5-13 years) were assessed using CogState, the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, 2nd edition (KABC-II) and the Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) at baseline and 8 weeks later. Correlations were run between CogState and the KABC-II and TOVA to evaluate its concurrent and convergent validity. Factor analysis was used to evaluate construct validity of CogState. Correlations between baseline and 8 weeks CogState scores were used to determine the test-retest reliability while general linear models were used to assess associations with sociodemographic factors.

resultsSignificant correlations were observed between CogState's One Card Learning, One Back Memory and Card Detection with the TOVA and between CogState's Maze Chase and One Back Memory with KABC-II's Simultaneous Processing. CogState had a three factor structure with Processing Speed, Processing Accuracy and Maze Chase and Maze Learning. CogState had low to moderate test-retest reliability in Ugandan children with correlations ranging from 0.32 to 0.57. Age, sex and education were associated with CogState outcomes.

conclusionsCogState is a valid and reliable test battery for rapid computer-based neurocognitive assessment in Ugandan children and can thus be used in this cultural context.

Indexed as

African childrenNeuropsychological assessmentReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID26279675
PMCPMC4536703
OpenAlexW1607578673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.