Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26279663›Full record

ArticleInterventional neurology2015

Demographic and Technical Risk Factors of 30-Day Stroke, Myocardial Infarction, and/or Death in Standard- and High-Risk Patients Who Underwent Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting.

Afshin Borhani Haghighi, Samaneh Yousefi, Ehsan Bahramali, Safoora Kokabi, Seyed Taghi Heydari, Abdolhamid Shariat, Alireza Nikseresht, Nahid Ashjazadeh, Sadegh Izadi, Peyman Petramfar and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Afshin Borhani HaghighiClinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran ; Department of Neurology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Samaneh YousefiNoncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Ehsan BahramaliCardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Safoora KokabiTransgenic Technology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Seyed Taghi HeydariHealth Policy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Abdolhamid ShariatClinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran ; Department of Neurology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Alireza NiksereshtClinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran ; Department of Neurology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Nahid AshjazadehClinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran ; Department of Neurology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Sadegh IzadiClinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran ; Department of Neurology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Peyman PetramfarClinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran ; Department of Neurology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Maryam PoursadeghClinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran ; Department of Neurology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Abbas Rahimi JaberiClinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran ; Department of Neurology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Sajjad EmamiDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.
Hamid AgheliShahidzadeh Hospital, Behbahan, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.
Reza NematiDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.
Ehsan YaghoubiDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.
Mohammad Hosein AbdiMotaharri Hospital, Marvdasht, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Majid PanahandehOrdibehesht Hospital, Shiraz, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Moslem HeydariDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Anahid SafariDepartment of Pharmacology, Kazeroon Azad University, Kazeroon, Iran.
Marziyeh BasirStudent Research Committee, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Salvador Cruz-FloresDepartment of Neurology, Texas Tech University, El Paso, Tex., USA.
Randal EdgellDepartment of Neurology, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Mo., USA ; Department of Psychiatry, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Mo., USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is an accepted treatment to prevent stroke in patients with carotid artery stenosis. The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for major complications after CAS. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a prospective study that was conducted at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in southern Iran from March 2011 to June 2014. Consecutive patients undergoing CAS were enrolled. Both standard- and high-risk patients for endarterectomy were enrolled. Demographic data, atherosclerotic risk factors, site of stenosis, degree of stenosis, and data regarding technical factors were recorded. Thirty-day stroke, myocardial infarction, and/or death were considered as the composite primary outcomes of the study.

resultsA total of 251 patients were recruited (mean age: 71.1 ± 9.6 years; male: 65.3%). Of these, 178 (70.9%) were symptomatic, 73 (29.1%) were diabetic, 129 (51.4%) were hyperlipidemic, 165 (65.7%) were hypertensive, and 62 (24.7%) patients were smokers. CAS was performed for left internal carotid artery (ICA) in 113 (45.4%) patients. Fourteen (5.6%) patients had sequential bilateral stenting. Mean stenosis of operated ICA was 80.2 ± 13.8%. An embolic protection device was used in 203 (96.2%) patients. Pre- and postdilation were performed in 39 (18.5%) and 182 (86.3%) patients, respectively. Composite outcomes were observed in 3.6% of patients (3.2% stroke, 0% myocardial infarction, and 1.2% death). Left-sided lesions and the presence of diabetes mellitus were significantly associated with poor short-term outcome (p = 0.025 and p = 0.020, respectively).

conclusionThere was a higher risk of short-term major complications in diabetic patients and for left carotid artery intervention.

Indexed as

Carotid artery angioplasty and stentingCerebrovascular diseaseOutcomeStroke

Identifiers

PMID26279663
PMCPMC4521192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.