ArticleInterventional neurology2015
Ipsilateral Infarct in Newly Diagnosed Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Atherosclerotic Occlusion.
Article in Interventional neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to determine factors associated with recent infarct (RI) in patients with newly identified atherosclerotic cervical internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO).
methodsThis was a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent cervical CT angiography from 2002 to 2006 at a single tertiary center. RI was defined by positive diffusion-weighted imaging/apparent diffusion coefficient magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the correspondent CICAO territory. Subjects were dichotomized into those with a RI versus patients with no RI (No-RI).
resultsOf 2,459 patients with cervical CT angiograms in the study period, 108 (4.4%) had complete medical records and brain MRI and were included. The mean age was 64 ± 13 years, 58% were men, and 62 (57%) had a RI. The demographics of the RI and No-RI patients were comparable, with the exception that those with RI had a lower frequency of coronary artery disease (CAD, 13 vs. 54%; p < 0.01) and dyslipidemia (38 vs. 69%; p < 0.01). The use of antiplatelets was not statistically different between the groups (56 vs. 71%; p = 0.1). Subjects with RI were less likely on statins (21 vs. 56%; p < 0.01) and antihypertensives (9 vs. 71%; p < 0.01). Multivariate regression revealed that CAD, the use of statins, and the use of antihypertensives were associated with No-RI CICAO presentation.
conclusionThe use of statins and antihypertensives is associated with a decreased risk of RI atherosclerotic CICAO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.