ArticleGenomics insights2010
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Caused by Assembly Errors.
Article in Genomics insights, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We compare the results of three different assembler programs, Celera, Phrap and Mira2, for the same set of about a hundred thousand Sanger reads derived from an unknown bacterial genome. In difference to previous assembly comparisons we do not focus on speed of computation and numbers of assembled contigs but on how the different sequence assemblies agree by content. Threefold consistently assembled genome regions are identified in order to estimate a lower bound of erroneously identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) caused by nothing but the process of mathematical sequence assembly. We identified 509 sequence triplets common to all three de-novo assemblies spanning only 34% (3.3 Mb) of the bacterial genome with 175 of these regions (~1.5 Mb) including erroneous SNPs and insertion/deletions. Within these triplets this on average leads to one error per 7,155 base pairs. Replacing the assembler Mira2 by the most recent version Mira3, the letter number even drops to 5,923. Our results therefore suggest that a considerably high number of erroneous SNPs may be present in current sequence data and mathematicians should urgently take up research on numerical stability of sequence assembly algorithms. Furthermore, even the latest versions of currently used assemblers produce erroneous SNPs that depend on the order reads are used as input. Such errors will severely hamper molecular diagnostics as well as relating genome variation and disease. This issue needs to be addressed urgently as the field is moving fast into clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.