Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26279593›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2007

On the Estimation of Disability-Free Life Expectancy: Sullivan' Method and Its Extension.

Kosuke Imai, Samir Soneji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Healthy Aging in Colombia 2018 and Its Variation in Relation to Social Conditions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Observational
  10. Structural disadvantages to the kin network from intergenerational racial health inequities.Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation · 2024
    Article
  11. Educational Inequalities in Dual-Function Life Expectancy.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Dual-Function Life Expectancy.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kosuke ImaiAssistant Professor, Department of Politics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.
Samir SonejiAssistant Professor, Department of Politics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.

Funding

GRADUATE PROGRAM IN DEMOGRAPHYT32HD007163 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MASSEY, DOUGLAS S · 1985 to 2015
$4.3M
Scientific and Technical Computing CoreP2CHD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SALGANIK, MATTHEW J. · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
National Science Foundation SES-0550873NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD047879NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A rapidly aging population, such as the United States today, is characterized by the increased prevalence of chronic impairment. Robust estimation of disability-free life expectancy (DFLE), or healthy life expectancy, is essential for examining whether additional years of life are spent in good health and whether life expectancy is increasing faster than the decline of disability rates. Over 30 years since its publication, Sullivan's method remains the most widely used method to estimate DFLE. Therefore, it is surprising to note that Sullivan did not provide any formal justification of his method. Debates in the literature have centered around the properties of Sullivan's method and have yielded conflicting results regarding the assumptions required for Sullivan's method. In this article we establish a statistical foundation of Sullivan's method. We prove that, under stationarity assumptions, Sullivan's estimator is unbiased and consistent. This resolves the debate in the literature, which has generally concluded that additional assumptions are necessary. We also show that the standard variance estimator is consistent and approximately unbiased. Finally, we demonstrate that Sullivan's method can be extended to estimate DFLE without stationarity assumptions. Such an extension is possible whenever a cohort life table and either consecutive cross-sectional disability surveys or a longitudinal survey are available. Our empirical analysis of the 1907 and 1912 U.S. birth cohorts suggests that while mortality rates remain approximately stationary, disability rates decline during this time period.

Indexed as

Aggregate dataDemographyHealthy life expectancyLife tablesMorbidityMortalityStationarity

Identifiers

PMID26279593
PMCPMC4533834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.