Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26279310›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Herd-level bovine tuberculosis risk factors: assessing the role of low-level badger population disturbance.

David M Wright, Neil Reid, W Ian Montgomery, Adrian R Allen, Robin A Skuce, Rowland R Kao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Shedding-weighted network approaches for understanding tuberculosis maintenance in multihost systems using camera traps.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bovine tuberculosis reactor cattle in Southwest Ethiopia: Risk factors for bovine tuberculosis.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Soil δScientific reports · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David M Wright1] School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland [2] College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1QH, Scotland.
Neil Reid1] School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland [2] Quercus, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland (UK) [3] Institute for Global Food Security (IGFS), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 5BN, Northern Ireland (UK).
W Ian Montgomery1] School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland [2] Quercus, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland (UK) [3] Institute for Global Food Security (IGFS), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 5BN, Northern Ireland (UK).
Adrian R AllenVeterinary Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Stormont, Belfast BT4 3SD, Northern Ireland.
Robin A Skuce1] School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland [2] Veterinary Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Stormont, Belfast BT4 3SD, Northern Ireland.
Rowland R KaoCollege of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1QH, Scotland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine TB (bTB) is endemic in Irish cattle and has eluded eradication despite considerable expenditure, amid debate over the relative roles of badgers and cattle in disease transmission. Using a comprehensive dataset from Northern Ireland (>10,000 km(2); 29,513 cattle herds), we investigated interactions between host populations in one of the first large-scale risk factor analyses for new herd breakdowns to combine data on both species. Cattle risk factors (movements, international imports, bTB history, neighbours with bTB) were more strongly associated with herd risk than area-level measures of badger social group density, habitat suitability or persecution (sett disturbance). Highest risks were in areas of high badger social group density and high rates of persecution, potentially representing both responsive persecution of badgers in high cattle risk areas and effects of persecution on cattle bTB risk through badger social group disruption. Average badger persecution was associated with reduced cattle bTB risk (compared with high persecution areas), so persecution may contribute towards sustaining bTB hotspots; findings with important implications for existing and planned disease control programmes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleDatabases, FactualDisease ReservoirsEcosystemLogistic ModelsMustelidaeRisk FactorsSeasonsTuberculosis, Bovine

Identifiers

PMID26279310
PMCPMC4642523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.