Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26279154›Full record

ArticleTrials2015

Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches.

Andrew J Copas, James J Lewis, Jennifer A Thompson, Calum Davey, Gianluca Baio, James R Hargreaves

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 156 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
156citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04029454 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Neovac 2 Burkina Faso: Impact of the Integration of Hepatitis B Birth Dose Vaccine Into the Infant Immunization Schedule: a Mixed Methods Study Including a Cluster-randomized Trial, an Anthropological Study and an Economic Evaluation

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut PasteurRan2020 to 2023Enrolled10,000ConditionsHepatitis BArmsbirth dose vaccination against hepatitis B strategy
NCT04915027 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Rehabkompassen® - a Novel Digital Tool for Facilitating Patient-tailored Rehabilitation in the Post-acute Continuum of Care After Stroke - A Multicenter Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUmeå UniversityRan2020 to 2027Enrolled1,106ConditionsStrokeArmsa usual follow-up with Rehabkompassen®, a usual follow-up with Post-Stroke Checklist, i.e. without Rehabkompassen®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

156 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Implementation of Coach McLungsBMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
    Trial
  14. Encouraging older adults with pre-frailty and frailty to "MoveStrong": an analysis of secondary outcomes for a pilot randomized controlled trial.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2022
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Effects of a Personal Health Record in Maternity Care: A Stepped-Wedge Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

96 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew J CopasMRC London Hub for Trials Methodology Research, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6NH, UK. a.copas@ucl.ac.uk.
James J LewisMRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK. James.Lewis@lshtm.ac.uk.
Jennifer A ThompsonMRC London Hub for Trials Methodology Research, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6NH, UK. Jennifer.Thompson@lshtm.ac.uk.
Calum DaveyDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK. Calum.Davey@lshtm.ac.uk.
Gianluca BaioDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. g.baio@ucl.ac.uk.
James R HargreavesDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK. James.Hargreaves@lshtm.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/29Medical Research Council MR/K007467/1Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1Medical Research Council MR/L004933/1Medical Research Council MR/L004933/1-P27
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited guidance on the design of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials. Current methodological literature focuses mainly on trials with cross-sectional data collection at discrete times, yet many recent stepped wedge trials do not follow this design. In this article, we present a typology to characterise the full range of stepped wedge designs, and offer guidance on several other design aspects.

methodsWe developed a framework to define and report the key characteristics of a stepped wedge trial, including cluster allocation and individual participation. We also considered the relative strengths and weaknesses of trials according to this framework. We classified recently published stepped wedge trials using this framework and identified illustrative case studies. We identified key design choices and developed guidance for each.

resultsWe identified three main stepped wedge designs: those with a closed cohort, an open cohort, and a continuous recruitment short exposure design. In the first two designs, many individuals experience both control and intervention conditions. In the final design, individuals are recruited in continuous time as they become eligible and experience either the control or intervention condition, but not both, and then provide an outcome measurement at follow-up. While most stepped wedge trials use simple randomisation, stratification and restricted randomisation are often feasible and may be useful. Some recent studies collect outcome information from individuals exposed a long time before or after the rollout period, but this contributes little to the primary analysis. Incomplete designs should be considered when the intervention cannot be implemented quickly. Carry-over effects can arise in stepped wedge trials with closed and open cohorts.

conclusionsStepped wedge trial designs should be reported more clearly. Researchers should consider the use of stratified and/or restricted randomisation. Trials should generally not commit resources to collect outcome data from individuals exposed a long time before or after the rollout period. Though substantial carry-over effects are uncommon in stepped wedge trials, researchers should consider their possibility before conducting a trial with closed or open cohorts.

Indexed as

Research DesignBiasHumansPatient SelectionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSample SizeTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID26279154
PMCPMC4538756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.