Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26279070›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2016

White-Coat Effect Among Older Adults: Data From the Jackson Heart Study.

Rikki M Tanner, Daichi Shimbo, Samantha R Seals, Kristi Reynolds, C Barrett Bowling, Gbenga Ogedegbe, Paul Muntner

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Age- and sex-specific reference values of biventricular flow components and kinetic energy by 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in healthy subjects.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023
    Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Rikki M TannerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Daichi ShimboDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Samantha R SealsCenter of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.
Kristi ReynoldsDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA.
C Barrett BowlingDepartment of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, GA.
Gbenga OgedegbeDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Paul MuntnerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USEmory University · USKaiser Permanente · USNew York University · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

WORKSITE BLOOD PRESSURE STUDYP01HL047540 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI BURG, MATTHEW M · 1993 to 2014
$27.7M
Incorporation of a Hypertension Working Group into the Jackson Heart StudyR01HL117323 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LEWIS, CORA E, OGEDEGBE, OLUGBENGA G. · 2013 to 2024
$7.2M
Midcareer Investigator Award in Patient-Oriented Research for Dr. Gbenga OgedegbeK24HL111315 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI OGEDEGBE, OLUGBENGA G. · 2012 to 2016
$621k
Midcareer Investigator Award in Patient-Oriented Research in Human HypertensionK24HL125704 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHIMBO, DAICHI · 2015 to 2019
$573k
Trajectories of Kidney Dysfunction in Older Adults with Chronic Kidney DiseaseIK2CX000856 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI BOWLING, CHRISTOPHER BARRETT · 2013 to 2017
–
CSRD VA IK2 CX000856NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201300046CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201300047CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201300048CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201300049CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201300050CNHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL111315NHLBI NIH HHS K24HL111315NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL125704NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL047540NHLBI NIH HHS P01-HL047540NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL117323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many adults with elevated clinic blood pressure (BP) have lower BP when measured outside the clinic. This phenomenon, the "white-coat effect," may be larger among older adults, a population more susceptible to the adverse effects of low BP. The authors analyzed data from 257 participants in the Jackson Heart Study with elevated clinic BP (systolic/diastolic BP [SBP/DBP] ≥140/90 mm Hg) who underwent ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). The white-coat effect for SBP was larger for participants 60 years and older vs those younger than 60 years in the overall population (12.2 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.2-15.1 mm Hg and 8.4 mm Hg, 95% CI, 5.7-11.1, respectively; P=.06) and among those without diabetes or chronic kidney disease (15.2 mm Hg, 95% CI, 10.1-20.2 and 8.6 mm Hg, 95% CI, 5.0-12.3, respectively; P=.04). After multivariable adjustment, clinic SBP ≥150 mm Hg vs <150 mm Hg was associated with a larger white-coat effect. Studies are needed to investigate the role of ABPM in guiding the initiation and titration of antihypertensive treatment, especially among older adults.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryWhite Coat HypertensionAdultAgedAge FactorsBlack or African AmericanComorbidityDemographyDisease ManagementFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMississippiOutcome Assessment, Health CareRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID26279070
PMCPMC4742426
OpenAlexW1772715720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.