Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26278490›Full record

ReviewTrends in molecular medicine2015

Promoting brain remodeling to aid in stroke recovery.

Zheng Gang Zhang, Michael Chopp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in molecular medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Wasp venom fromPharmaceutical biology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Principles and requirements for stroke recovery science.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zheng Gang ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA. Electronic address: zhazh@neuro.hfh.edu.
Michael ChoppDepartment of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA; Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA.

Funding

miR-17-92 exosome treatment of strokeR01NS088656 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI CHOPP, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
Ac-SDKP for Treatment of Acute StrokeR01NS079612 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ZHANG, ZHENG GANG · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
MicroRNAs and neurogenesis after strokeR01NS075156 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ZHANG, ZHENG GANG · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS075156NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS079612NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS 088656NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endogenous brain repair after stroke involves a set of highly interactive processes, such as angiogenesis, neurogenesis, oligodendrogenesis, synaptogenesis, and axonal outgrowth, which together orchestrate neurological recovery. During the past several years, there have been advances in our understanding of miRNAs and histone deacetylases (HDACs) in brain repair processes after stroke. Emerging data indicate the important role of exosomes for intercellular communication in promoting coupled brain remodeling processes. These advances will likely have a major impact on the development of restorative therapies for ischemic brain repair, consequently leading to improvement of neurological function. In this review, we provide an update on our current understanding of cellular and molecular mechanisms of miRNAs, exosomes, and HDACs in brain restorative processes after stroke.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainHumansMicroRNAsRecovery of FunctionStrokeMicroRNAsexosomesmiRNAsneurorestorative therapystroke recovery

Identifiers

PMID26278490
PMCPMC4567429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.