ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2015
The domain of neuronal firing on a plane of input current and conductance.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complex excitability and "flipping" of granule cells: An experimental and computational study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Single-compartment model of a pyramidal neuron, fitted to recordings with current and conductance injection.Biological cybernetics · 2023Article
- Increased noise relates to abnormal excitation-inhibition balance in schizophrenia: a combined empirical and computational study.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Synaptic Conductances during Interictal Discharges in Pyramidal Neurons of Rat Entorhinal Cortex.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The activation of neurotransmitter receptors increases the current flow and membrane conductance and thus controls the firing rate of a neuron. In the present work, we justified the two-dimensional representation of a neuronal input by voltage-independent current and conductance and obtained experimentally and numerically a complete input-output (I/O) function. The dependence of the steady-state firing rate on the input current and conductance was studied as a two-parameter I/O function. We employed the dynamic patch clamp technique in slices to get this dependence for the whole domain of two input signals that evoke stationary spike trains in a single neuron (Ω-domain). As found, the Ω-domain is finite and an additional conductance decreases the range of spike-evoking currents. The I/O function has been reproduced in a Hodgkin-Huxley-like model. Among the simulated effects of different factors on the I/O function, including passive and active membrane properties, external conditions and input signal properties, the most interesting were: the shift of the right boundary of the Ω-domain (corresponding to the exCitation block) leftwards due to the decrease of the maximal potassium conductance; and the reduction of the Ω-domain by the decrease of the maximal sodium concentration. As found in experiments and simulations, the Ω-domain is reduced by the decrease of extracellular sodium concentration, by cooling, and by adding slow potassium currents providing interspike interval adaptation; the Ω-domain height is increased by adding color noise. Our modeling data provided a generalization of I/O dependencies that is consistent with previous studies and our experiments. Our results suggest that both current flow and membrane conductance should be taken into account when determining neuronal firing activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.