Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26278127›Full record

ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2016

Safety climate in English general practices: workload pressures may compromise safety.

Brian G Bell, David Reeves, Kate Marsden, Anthony Avery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. GPs' perceptions of resilience training: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  14. Influences on GP coping and resilience: a qualitative study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brian G BellDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
David ReevesCentre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kate MarsdenDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Anthony AveryDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAlthough most health care interactions in the developed world occur in general practice, most of the literature on patient safety has focused on secondary care services. To address this issue, we have constructed a patient safety toolkit for English general practices. We report how practice and respondent characteristics affect scores on our safety climate measure, the PC-Safequest, and address recent concerns with high levels of workload in English general practices.

methodsWe administered the PC-Safequest, a 30-item tool that was designed to measure safety climate in primary care practices, to 335 primary care staff members in 31 practices in England. Practice characteristics, such as list size and deprivation in the area the practice served, and respondent characteristics, such as whether the respondent was a manager, were also collected and used in a multilevel analysis to predict PC-Safequest scores.

resultsManagers gave their practices significantly higher safety climate scores than did non-managers. Respondents with more years of experience had a more negative perception of the level of workload in their practice. Practices with more registered patients and in areas of higher deprivation provided lower safety climate scores.

conclusionsManagers rated their practices more positively on our safety climate measure, so the differences between the perceptions of managers and other staff may need to be reduced in order to build a strong safety culture. Excessive workload for more experienced staff and lower safety climate scores for larger practices may reflect 'burnout'. Concerns that pressures in primary care could affect patient safety are discussed.

Indexed as

General PracticeOrganizational CulturePatient SafetyWorkloadAgedEnglandFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health Careclinical safetyerrorshealth policypatient safetyprimary caresafety climate

Identifiers

PMID26278127
PMCPMC4949509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.