Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26278005›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of obesity (2005)2016

Effect of extended morning fasting upon ad libitum lunch intake and associated metabolic and hormonal responses in obese adults.

E A Chowdhury, J D Richardson, K Tsintzas, D Thompson, J A Betts

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of obesity (2005), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04735783 (Effect of the Perception of Breakfast Consumption on Appetite and Energy Intake in Healthy Males), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04735783 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Effect of the Perception of Breakfast Consumption on Appetite and Energy Intake in Healthy Males

TypeinterventionalSponsorNottingham Trent UniversityRan2020 to 2020Enrolled14ConditionsObesityArmsPlacebo breakfast, Typical whole-food breakfast, Water-only control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Intermittent fasting for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Nutrient timing and metabolic regulation.The Journal of physiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Breakfast Nutritional Quality and Cognitive Interference in University Students from Mexico City.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E A ChowdhuryDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
J D RichardsonDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
K TsintzasSchool of Life Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
D ThompsonDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
J A BettsDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
University of Bath · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H008322/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesBreakfast omission is positively associated with obesity and increased risk of disease. However, little is known about the acute effects of extended morning fasting upon subsequent energy intake and associated metabolic/regulatory factors in obese adults. SUBJECTS/

methodsIn a randomised cross-over design, 24 obese men (n=8) and women (n=16) extended their overnight fast by omitting breakfast consumption or ingesting a typical carbohydrate-rich breakfast of 2183±393 kJ (521±94 kcal), before an ad libitum pasta lunch 3 h later. Blood samples were obtained throughout the day until 3 h post lunch and analysed for hormones implicated in appetite regulation, along with metabolic outcomes and subjective appetite measures.

resultsLunch intake was unaffected by extended morning fasting (difference=218 kJ, 95% confidence interval -54 kJ, 490 kJ; P=0.1) resulting in lower total intake in the fasting trial (difference=-1964 kJ, 95% confidence interval -1645 kJ, -2281 kJ; P<0.01). Systemic concentrations of peptide tyrosine-tyrosine and leptin were lower during the afternoon following morning fasting (P⩽0.06). Plasma-acylated ghrelin concentrations were also lower following the ad libitum lunch in the fasting trial (P<0.05) but this effect was not apparent for total ghrelin (P⩾0.1). Serum insulin concentrations were greater throughout the afternoon in the fasting trial (P=0.05), with plasma glucose also greater 1 h after lunch (P<0.01). Extended morning fasting did not result in greater appetite ratings after lunch, with some tendency for lower appetite 3 h post lunch (P=0.09).

conclusionsWe demonstrate for the first time that, in obese adults, extended morning fasting does not cause compensatory intake during an ad libitum lunch nor does it increase appetite during the afternoon. Morning fasting reduced satiety hormone responses to a subsequent lunch meal but counterintuitively also reduced concentrations of the appetite-stimulating hormone-acylated ghrelin during the afternoon relative to lunch consumed after breakfast.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeAdultAppetite RegulationBlood GlucoseBreakfastCross-Over StudiesDietary CarbohydratesDipeptidesEnglandFastingFemaleGhrelinHumansLeptinLunchMaleBlood GlucoseDietary CarbohydratesDipeptidesGhrelinLeptintyrosyltyrosine

Identifiers

PMID26278005
PMCPMC4753359
OpenAlexW1119777164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.