Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26277483›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2015

Tumor infiltration pattern into the surrounding tissue has prognostic significance in advanced gastric cancer.

Hiroaki Saito, Kozo Miyatani, Seigo Takaya, Hirohiko Kuroda, Tomoyuki Matsunaga, Yoji Fukumoto, Tomohiro Osaki, Masahide Ikeguchi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroaki SaitoDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Tottori University School of Medicine, 36-1 Nishi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan. sai10@med.tottori-u.ac.jp.
Kozo MiyataniDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Tottori University School of Medicine, 36-1 Nishi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Seigo TakayaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Tottori University School of Medicine, 36-1 Nishi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Hirohiko KurodaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Tottori University School of Medicine, 36-1 Nishi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Tomoyuki MatsunagaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Tottori University School of Medicine, 36-1 Nishi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Yoji FukumotoDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Tottori University School of Medicine, 36-1 Nishi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Tomohiro OsakiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Tottori University School of Medicine, 36-1 Nishi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Masahide IkeguchiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Tottori University School of Medicine, 36-1 Nishi-cho, Yonago, 683-8504, Japan.
Tottori University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer can be classified into three subgroups according to pattern of tumor infiltration into the surrounding tissue: INFa (expanding growth and a distinct border with the surrounding tissue), INFc (infiltrating growth and an indistinct border with the surrounding tissue), and INFb (in-between a and c). How the tumor infiltration pattern (INF) relates to prognosis and type of recurrence in advanced gastric cancer has not been sufficiently explored. We examined 805 consecutive advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients who underwent curative gastrectomy at our institution between 1980 and 2005. Poor differentiation, serosal invasion, and lymph node metastasis were significantly more frequent in patients with INFc tumors than in those with INFa/b tumors. For patients with a T2 or T3 tumor, there was no significant difference in prognosis between those with INFa/b and with INFc. However, for patients with a T4a or T4b tumor, the prognosis of those with INFc was significantly worse than that of those with INFa/b. In multivariate analysis, INF was an independent prognostic indicator in T4a but not T2, T3, and T4b. Furthermore, the prognosis of T4 patients with INFc tumors was significantly worse than that of those with INFa/b, especially in node-negative but not in node-positive cases. In patients with a T4a or T4b tumor, peritoneal recurrence was significantly more frequent for those with INFc than for those with INFa/b. Our data indicate that INF is useful to predict the prognosis and recurrence pattern in T4a node-negative gastric cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisStomachStomach NeoplasmsYoung AdultGastric carcinomaPrognosisRecurrenceTumor infiltration pattern

Identifiers

PMID26277483
OpenAlexW1421713513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.