Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26277424›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

SW1PerS: Sliding windows and 1-persistence scoring; discovering periodicity in gene expression time series data.

Jose A Perea, Anastasia Deckard, Steve B Haase, John Harer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Detecting Rhythmic Gene Expression in Single Cell Transcriptomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Survey of Topological Machine Learning Methods.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2021
    Review
  9. Topological Data Analysis ofFrontiers in artificial intelligence · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Universal method for robust detection of circadian state from gene expression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  14. Gene Coexpression Network Comparison via Persistent Homology.International journal of genomics · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jose A PereaDepartment of Mathematics, Duke University, Science Dr, Durham, 27708, NC, USA. joperea@math.duke.edu.
Anastasia DeckardProgram in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, 27708, NC, USA. anastasia@deckard.edu.
Steve B HaaseCenter for Systems Biology, Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, Durham, 27708, NC, USA. shaase@duke.edu.
John HarerDepartment of Mathematics, Duke University, Science Dr, Durham, 27708, NC, USA. harer@math.duke.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying periodically expressed genes across different processes (e.g. the cell and metabolic cycles, circadian rhythms, etc) is a central problem in computational biology. Biological time series may contain (multiple) unknown signal shapes of systemic relevance, imperfections like noise, damping, and trending, or limited sampling density. While there exist methods for detecting periodicity, their design biases (e.g. toward a specific signal shape) can limit their applicability in one or more of these situations.

methodsWe present in this paper a novel method, SW1PerS, for quantifying periodicity in time series in a shape-agnostic manner and with resistance to damping. The measurement is performed directly, without presupposing a particular pattern, by evaluating the circularity of a high-dimensional representation of the signal. SW1PerS is compared to other algorithms using synthetic data and performance is quantified under varying noise models, noise levels, sampling densities, and signal shapes. Results on biological data are also analyzed and compared.

resultsOn the task of periodic/not-periodic classification, using synthetic data, SW1PerS outperforms all other algorithms in the low-noise regime. SW1PerS is shown to be the most shape-agnostic of the evaluated methods, and the only one to consistently classify damped signals as highly periodic. On biological data, and for several experiments, the lists of top 10% genes ranked with SW1PerS recover up to 67% of those generated with other popular algorithms. Moreover, the list of genes from data on the Yeast metabolic cycle which are highly-ranked only by SW1PerS, contains evidently non-cosine patterns (e.g. ECM33, CDC9, SAM1,2 and MSH6) with highly periodic expression profiles. In data from the Yeast cell cycle SW1PerS identifies genes not preferred by other algorithms, hence not previously reported as periodic, but found in other experiments such as the universal growth rate response of Slavov. These genes are BOP3, CDC10, YIL108W, YER034W, MLP1, PAC2 and RTT101.

conclusionsIn biological systems with low noise, i.e. where periodic signals with interesting shapes are more likely to occur, SW1PerS can be used as a powerful tool in exploratory analyses. Indeed, by having an initial set of periodic genes with a rich variety of signal types, pattern/shape information can be included in the study of systems and the generation of hypotheses regarding the structure of gene regulatory networks.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArea Under CurveCell DivisionCircadian RhythmGene Expression ProfilingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisROC CurveSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID26277424
PMCPMC4537550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.