Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26276843›Full record

ReviewPlant physiology2015

Something Old, Something New: Conserved Enzymes and the Evolution of Novelty in Plant Specialized Metabolism.

Gaurav D Moghe, Robert L Last

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evolution of aromatic amino acid metabolism in plants: a key driving force behind plant chemical diversity in aromatic natural products.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gaurav D MogheDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (G.D.M., R.L.L.) and Department of Plant Biology (R.L.L.), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8761-064X
Robert L LastDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (G.D.M., R.L.L.) and Department of Plant Biology (R.L.L.), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824 lastr@msu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6974-9587

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants produce hundreds of thousands of small molecules known as specialized metabolites, many of which are of economic and ecological importance. This remarkable variety is a consequence of the diversity and rapid evolution of specialized metabolic pathways. These novel biosynthetic pathways originate via gene duplication or by functional divergence of existing genes, and they subsequently evolve through selection and/or drift. Studies over the past two decades revealed that diverse specialized metabolic pathways have resulted from the incorporation of primary metabolic enzymes. We discuss examples of enzyme recruitment from primary metabolism and the variety of paths taken by duplicated primary metabolic enzymes toward integration into specialized metabolism. These examples provide insight into processes by which plant specialized metabolic pathways evolve and suggest approaches to discover enzymes of previously uncharacterized metabolic networks.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEnzymesGene Expression Regulation, PlantMetabolic Networks and PathwaysPlantsSpecies SpecificityEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID26276843
PMCPMC4634076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.