Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26276744›Full record

Trial reportCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2015

Modulation of Breast Cancer Risk Biomarkers by High-Dose Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Phase II Pilot Study in Postmenopausal Women.

Carol J Fabian, Bruce F Kimler, Teresa A Phillips, Jennifer L Nydegger, Amy L Kreutzjans, Susan E Carlson, Brandon H Hidaka, Trina Metheny, Carola M Zalles, Gordon B Mills and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The potential contribution of dietary factors to breast cancer prevention.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carol J FabianDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas. cfabian@kumc.edu.
Bruce F KimlerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Teresa A PhillipsDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Jennifer L NydeggerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Amy L KreutzjansDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Susan E CarlsonDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Brandon H HidakaDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Trina MethenyDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Carola M ZallesMercy Hospital, Miami, Florida.
Gordon B MillsDepartment of Systems Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Kandy R PowersDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Debra K SullivanDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Brian K PetroffDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Whitney L HensingDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Brooke L FridleyDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Stephen D HurstingDepartment of Nutrition, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Miami Hospital · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
PROJECT 3 - Steroid-Metabolic Interactions In the Control of GnRH NeuronsU54HD028934 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI MARSHALL, JOHN C · 1998 to 2013
$16.5M
Testosterone-GnRH Frequency and the Evolution of PCOS in AdolescenceP50HD028934 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HAISENLEDER, DANIEL J. · 2014 to 2018
$8.6M
Novel Approaches for the Control of Microbial PathogensP30GM103326 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI LUTKENHAUS, JOSEPH F · 2012 to 2016
$5.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA16672NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD028934NICHD NIH HHS U54-HD28934NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Associational studies suggest higher intakes/blood levels of the omega-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) relative to the omega-6 arachidonic acid (AA) are associated with reduced breast cancer risk. We performed a pilot study of high-dose EPA + DHA in postmenopausal women to assess feasibility before initiating a phase IIB prevention trial. Postmenopausal women with cytologic evidence of hyperplasia in their baseline random periareolar fine needle aspiration (RPFNA) took 1,860 mg EPA +1500 mg DHA ethyl esters daily for 6 months. Blood and breast tissue were sampled at baseline and study conclusion for exploratory biomarker assessment, with P values uncorrected for multiple comparisons. Feasibility was predefined as 50% uptake, 80% completion, and 70% compliance. Trial uptake by 35 study entrants from 54 eligible women was 65%, with 97% completion and 97% compliance. Favorable modulation was suggested for serum adiponectin (P = 0.0027), TNFα (P = 0.016), HOMA 2B measure of pancreatic β cell function (P = 0.0048), and bioavailable estradiol (P = 0.039). Benign breast tissue Ki-67 (P = 0.036), macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 (P = 0.033), cytomorphology index score (P = 0.014), and percent mammographic density (P = 0.036) were decreased with favorable effects in a proteomics array for several proteins associated with mitogen signaling and cell-cycle arrest; but no obvious overall effect on proteins downstream of mTOR. Although favorable risk biomarker modulation will need to be confirmed in a placebo-controlled trial, we have demonstrated feasibility for development of high-dose EPA and DHA ethyl esters for primary prevention of breast cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsChromatography, Thin LayerDocosahexaenoic AcidsDrug CombinationsEicosapentaenoic AcidFatty Acids, Omega-3Feasibility StudiesFemaleHumansHyperplasiaMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPostmenopauseBiomarkers, TumorDocosahexaenoic AcidsDrug CombinationsEicosapentaenoic AcidFatty Acids, Omega-3Omacor

Identifiers

PMID26276744
PMCPMC4596784
OpenAlexW2168160634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.