Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26276527›Full record

ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2015

Glioblastoma recurrence patterns near neural stem cell regions.

Linda Chen, Kaisorn L Chaichana, Lawrence Kleinberg, Xiaobu Ye, Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa, Kristin Redmond

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Novel Strategies for Nanoparticle-Based Radiosensitization in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Linda ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.
Kaisorn L ChaichanaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.
Lawrence KleinbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.
Xiaobu YeSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.
Alfredo Quinones-HinojosaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States. Electronic address: aquinon2@jhmi.edu.
Kristin RedmondDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States. Electronic address: kjanson3@jhmi.edu.

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Role of NKCC1 on Brain Tumor Stem Cell Migration After EGF and Slit-2 StimulationR01NS070024 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI QUINONES-HINOJOSA, ALFREDO · 2010 to 2014
$2.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS070024NINDS NIH HHS R01NS070024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGlioblastoma (GBM) cancer stem cells and their neural stem cell counterparts are hypothesized to contribute to tumor progression. We examined whether GBM contrast enhancement contact with neurogenic regions (NR) affect recurrence patterns, as contrast enhancement reflects regions of blood-brain barrier breakdown.

methods102 patients with primary GBM, treated at Johns Hopkins Hospital between 2006 and 2009, were included. All patients underwent surgical resection followed by adjuvant IMRT (60 Gy/30 fractions) and concomitant temozolomide. Initial and recurrent tumor distance from the subventricular zone (SVZ) or subgranular zone (SGZ) was measured. Tumors were categorized as NR contacting or non-contacting. The chi-square test was used to analyze the association between tumor contact and recurrence pattern.

results49 of 102 (48.0%, 95% CI: 0.386-0.576) tumors contacted NRs at initial presentation, and, of these tumors, 49/49 (100%) contacted NRs at recurrence. Of 53 tumors that were initially non-contacting, 37/53 (69.8%, 95% CI: 0.565-0.804) recurred contacting NRs. In total, 86/102 (84.3%, 95% CI: 0.760-0.901) recurrent GBM contacted NRs compared with 49/102 (48%, 95% CI: 0.386-0.576) at initial presentation. Of the recurrent tumors that did not contact NRs, 16/53 (30.1%, 95% CI: 0.195-0.435) recurred medially toward NRs with a significant decrease in distance between tumor contrast enhancement and NRs. 16/49 (32.6%, 95% CI: 0.212-0.466) initially NR-contacting GBMs recurred out-of field while 7/53 (13.2%, 95% CI: 0.0655-0.248) initially non-contacting recurred out of the radiation treatment field (p=0.0315, Odds ratio: 3.19, 95% CI: 1.18-8.62).

conclusionsGBM contrast-enhancing recurrence is significantly associated with proximity to NRs. NR-contacting initial tumors were more likely to recur out of radiation treatment fields.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeural Stem CellsGlioblastomaRecurrenceSubventricular zone

Identifiers

PMID26276527
PMCPMC4857206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.