ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2016
Superagonism at G protein-coupled receptors and beyond.
Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Landscaping the Nitazene Scaffold to Identify Novel Mu-Opioid Receptor Modulators: From Molecular Design and Chemical Synthesis to Pharmacological Profiling.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Biased agonism in psychopharmacology: an opportunity to improve efficacy and safety of treatments.CNS spectrums · 2025Review
- Diazepine Agonists of the 5-HTJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- GPCRVS - AI-driven Decision Support System for GPCR Virtual Screening.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- A correlation study of adhesion G protein-coupled receptors as potential therapeutic targets for breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Structural and dynamic insights into the activation of the μ-opioid receptor by an allosteric modulator.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Subtle Structural Modification of a Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist Drastically Increases its Efficacy at the CB1 Receptor.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2023Article
- Carfentanil is a β-arrestin-biased agonist at the μ opioid receptor.British journal of pharmacology · 2023Article
- Article
- Activation mechanism of the μ-opioid receptor by an allosteric modulator.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Allosteric modulators enhance agonist efficacy by increasing the residence time of a GPCR in the active state.Nature communications · 2021Article
- PTH1R Actions on Bone Using the cAMP/Protein Kinase A Pathway.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Review
- A Dynamic, Split-Luciferase-Based Mini-G Protein Sensor to Functionally Characterize Ligands at All Four Histamine Receptor Subtypes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Article
- Discovery of a GPR40 Superagonist: The Impact of Aryl Propionic Acid α-Fluorination.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2019Article
- A split luciferase-based probe for quantitative proximal determination of GαScientific reports · 2018Article
- Small-Molecule Neuromedin U Receptor 2 Agonists Suppress Food Intake and Decrease Visceral Fat in Animal Models.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2018Article
- Oleoylethanolamide modulates glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist signaling and enhances exendin-4-mediated weight loss in obese mice.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2018Article
- Molecular pharmacology of G protein-coupled receptors.British journal of pharmacology · 2016Article
- Superagonism at G protein-coupled receptors and beyond.British journal of pharmacology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ligands targeting GPCRs can be categorized according to their intrinsic efficacy to trigger a specific, receptor-mediated response. A ligand endowed with the same level of efficacy as the endogenous agonist can be classified as a full agonist, whereas a compound that displays greater efficacy, that is, higher receptor signalling output than the endogenous agonist, can be called a superagonist. Subsequent to GPCR activation, an intracellular signalling cascade is set in motion, which may generate substantial amplification of the signal. This may obscure superagonism in pharmacological assays and, therefore, the definition of superagonism necessitates a combination of operational approaches, reduction of spare receptors or estimation of receptor activation close to the receptor level to quantify relative agonist efficacies in a particular system. The first part of this review will compare GPCR superagonism with superagonism in the field of immunology, where this term is well established. In the second part, known GPCR superagonists will be reviewed. Then, the experimental and analytical challenges in the deconvolution of GPCR superagonism will be addressed. Finally, the potential benefit of superagonism is discussed. The molecular mechanisms behind GPCR superagonism are not completely understood. However, crystallography shows that agonist binding alone is not sufficient for a fully active receptor state and that binding of the G protein is at least equally important. Accordingly, the emerging number of reported superagonists implies that ligand-induced receptor conformations more active than the ones stabilized by the endogenous agonist are indeed feasible. Superagonists may have therapeutic potential when receptor function is impaired or to induce negative feedback mechanisms. Linked Articles This article is part of a themed section on Molecular Pharmacology of G Protein-Coupled Receptors. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v173.20/issuetoc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.