Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26276399›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2015

Hypothesis generation using network structures on community health center cancer-screening performance.

Timothy Jay Carney, Geoffrey P Morgan, Josette Jones, Anna M McDaniel, Michael T Weaver, Bryan Weiner, David A Haggstrom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Timothy Jay CarneyIndiana University School of Informatics (IUPUI), United States; University of North Carolina, Gillings School of Global Public Health, United States; Global Health Equity Intelligence Collaborative (GHEIC), LLC, United States. Electronic address: tcarney@unc.edu.
Geoffrey P MorganCarnegie Mellon University, Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems (CASOS), United States. Electronic address: gmorgan@cs.cmu.edu.
Josette JonesIndiana University School of Informatics (IUPUI), United States. Electronic address: jofjones@iupui.edu.
Anna M McDanielIndiana University School of Informatics (IUPUI), United States; Indiana University School of Nursing, United States. Electronic address: amcdanie@iupui.edu.
Michael T WeaverIndiana University School of Nursing, United States. Electronic address: mtweaver@iupui.edu.
Bryan WeinerUniversity of North Carolina, Gillings School of Global Public Health, United States. Electronic address: weiner@email.unc.edu.
David A HaggstromVA HSR&D Center of Excellence on Implementing Evidence-based Practice, Roudebush VA Medical Center, United States; Division of General Internal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, United States; IU Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., United States. Electronic address: dahaggst@iupui.edu.

Funding

Training ProgramU54CA153602 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GODLEY, PAUL A. · 2010 to 2015
$5.4M
Training in Research for Behavioral Oncology and Cancer Control ProgramR25CA117865 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE · 2006 to 2015
$4.1M
Cancer Health Disparities Training ProgramT32CA128582 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SMITH, JENNIFER SUSAN, TATE, DEBORAH F. · 2009 to 2023
$3.4M
Interdisciplinary Training in Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA117865 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Victoria Lee Champion, Catherine E Mosher · 2016 to 2026
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA117865NCI NIH HHS T32 CA117865NCI NIH HHS T32 CA128582NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RESEARCH

objectivesNationally sponsored cancer-care quality-improvement efforts have been deployed in community health centers to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer-screening rates among vulnerable populations. Despite several immediate and short-term gains, screening rates remain below national benchmark objectives. Overall improvement has been both difficult to sustain over time in some organizational settings and/or challenging to diffuse to other settings as repeatable best practices. Reasons for this include facility-level changes, which typically occur in dynamic organizational environments that are complex, adaptive, and unpredictable. This study seeks to understand the factors that shape community health center facility-level cancer-screening performance over time. This study applies a computational-modeling approach, combining principles of health-services research, health informatics, network theory, and systems science.

methodsTo investigate the roles of knowledge acquisition, retention, and sharing within the setting of the community health center and to examine their effects on the relationship between clinical decision support capabilities and improvement in cancer-screening rate improvement, we employed Construct-TM to create simulated community health centers using previously collected point-in-time survey data. Construct-TM is a multi-agent model of network evolution. Because social, knowledge, and belief networks co-evolve, groups and organizations are treated as complex systems to capture the variability of human and organizational factors. In Construct-TM, individuals and groups interact by communicating, learning, and making decisions in a continuous cycle. Data from the survey was used to differentiate high-performing simulated community health centers from low-performing ones based on computer-based decision support usage and self-reported cancer-screening improvement.

resultsThis virtual experiment revealed that patterns of overall network symmetry, agent cohesion, and connectedness varied by community health center performance level. Visual assessment of both the agent-to-agent knowledge sharing network and agent-to-resource knowledge use network diagrams demonstrated that community health centers labeled as high performers typically showed higher levels of collaboration and cohesiveness among agent classes, faster knowledge-absorption rates, and fewer agents that were unconnected to key knowledge resources. Conclusions and research implications: Using the point-in-time survey data outlining community health center cancer-screening practices, our computational model successfully distinguished between high and low performers. Results indicated that high-performance environments displayed distinctive network characteristics in patterns of interaction among agents, as well as in the access and utilization of key knowledge resources. Our study demonstrated how non-network-specific data obtained from a point-in-time survey can be employed to forecast community health center performance over time, thereby enhancing the sustainability of long-term strategic-improvement efforts. Our results revealed a strategic profile for community health center cancer-screening improvement via simulation over a projected 10-year period. The use of computational modeling allows additional inferential knowledge to be drawn from existing data when examining organizational performance in increasingly complex environments.

Indexed as

Community Health CentersComputer SimulationDecision Support Systems, ClinicalCooperative BehaviorEarly Detection of CancerHumansModels, StatisticalOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality ImprovementCancer screeningCommunity health centersComputational modelingHealth DisparitiesLearning health systemNetwork theorySimulationSystems-thinking

Identifiers

PMID26276399
PMCPMC5896023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.