Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26276393›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2015

Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecG protein but not RuvAB or RecA protein is efficient at remodeling the stalled replication forks: implications for multiple mechanisms of replication restart in mycobacteria.

Roshan Singh Thakur, Shivakumar Basavaraju, Jasbeer Singh Khanduja, K Muniyappa, Ganesh Nagaraju

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roshan Singh ThakurFrom the Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore-560012, India.
Shivakumar BasavarajuFrom the Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore-560012, India.
Jasbeer Singh KhandujaFrom the Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore-560012, India.
K MuniyappaFrom the Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore-560012, India.
Ganesh NagarajuFrom the Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore-560012, India nganesh@biochem.iisc.ernet.in.
Indian Institute of Science Bangalore · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aberrant DNA replication, defects in the protection, and restart of stalled replication forks are major causes of genome instability in all organisms. Replication fork reversal is emerging as an evolutionarily conserved physiological response for restart of stalled forks. Escherichia coli RecG, RuvAB, and RecA proteins have been shown to reverse the model replication fork structures in vitro. However, the pathways and the mechanisms by which Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow growing human pathogen, responds to different types of replication stress and DNA damage are unclear. Here, we show that M. tuberculosis RecG rescues E. coli ΔrecG cells from replicative stress. The purified M. tuberculosis RecG (MtRecG) and RuvAB (MtRuvAB) proteins catalyze fork reversal of model replication fork structures with and without a leading strand single-stranded DNA gap. Interestingly, single-stranded DNA-binding protein suppresses the MtRecG- and MtRuvAB-mediated fork reversal with substrates that contain lagging strand gap. Notably, our comparative studies with fork structures containing template damage and template switching mechanism of lesion bypass reveal that MtRecG but not MtRuvAB or MtRecA is proficient in driving the fork reversal. Finally, unlike MtRuvAB, we find that MtRecG drives efficient reversal of forks when fork structures are tightly bound by protein. These results provide direct evidence and valuable insights into the underlying mechanism of MtRecG-catalyzed replication fork remodeling and restart pathways in vivo.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA HelicasesEscherichia coliGenetic Complementation TestGenome, BacterialGenomic InstabilityMutationMycobacterium tuberculosisNucleic Acid ConformationOligonucleotidesRec A RecombinasesBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesOligonucleotidesRec A RecombinasesDNA damageDNA helicaseDNA replicationgenomic instabilityMycobacterium tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID26276393
PMCPMC4591802
OpenAlexW1831669680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.