ArticleWorld journal of urology2016
Pharmacological modulation of ureteric peristalsis in a chronically instrumented conscious pig model: effect of adrenergic and nitrergic modulation.
Article in World journal of urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying peristaltic pacemaker cells in the upper urinary tract.The Journal of physiology · 2026Review
- Risks of flexible ureterorenoscopy: pathophysiology and prevention.Urolithiasis · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the role of adrenergic and nitrergic signaling on ureteric peristaltic frequency and contraction force in vivo using a large animal model.
methodsTwelve female pigs (72 ± 4 kg) were chronically instrumented with an electronic pressure-monitoring catheter in the right ureter. Nephrostomy, cystostomy, and arterial and venous catheters were left in situ. Ureteral peristalsis was recorded before and after the administration of propranolol, isoprenaline, doxazosin, urapidil, phenylephrine, LNNA (Nω-nitro-L-arginine), and L-arginine.
resultsα1-Adrenergic receptor stimulation resulted in an increased P max and peristaltic frequency. However, α1-inhibition decreased P max alone. Similarly, β-adrenergic stimulation decreased P max and peristaltic frequency, whereas β-inhibition increased only P max. LNNA administration increased P max in the distal ureter and hydrostatic pressure in the pyelocalyceal system. L-Arginine did not affect P max or frequency, but resulted in a significantly higher diuresis. Either agonist or antagonist of NO did not affect peristaltic frequency and length of contraction.
conclusionsActivation of α- and β-adrenergic receptors, respectively, stimulates and inhibits ureteric peristalsis. The biological effect of NO on ureteric motility is regionally determined and corresponds to the distribution of NOS-positive nerves. Inhibition of NOS activity increases P max in the distal ureter and tonic activity of the ureteric muscle resulting in higher hydrostatic pressure in the renal pelvis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.