Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26275996›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology2016

Utilization of Observation Units for the Care of Poisoned Patients: Trends from the Toxicology Investigators Consortium Case Registry.

Bryan S Judge, Lindsey M Ouellette, Melissa VandenBerg, Brad D Riley, Paul M Wax, Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) Case Registry

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reducing Childhood Admissions to the PICU for Poisoning (ReCAP2) by Predicting Unnecessary PICU Admissions After Acute Intoxication.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2018
    Article
  5. The Toxicology Investigators Consortium Case Registry-the 2016 Experience.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bryan S JudgeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Secchia Center, 15 Michigan Ave NE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA. bryan.judge@spectrumhealth.org.
Lindsey M OuelletteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Secchia Center, 15 Michigan Ave NE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA.
Melissa VandenBergSpectrum Health Toxicology Services, 1840 Wealthy St. SE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49506, USA.
Brad D RileyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Secchia Center, 15 Michigan Ave NE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA.
Paul M WaxUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) Case Registry

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many poisoned patients may only require a period of observation after their exposure. There are limited data describing the use of observation units for managing poisoned adult and pediatric patients. We performed a retrospective review of all patients reported to the ToxIC Case Registry between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2013. Eligible patients included those who received a bedside consultation by a medical toxicologist and whose care was provided in an observation unit, or those who were admitted under the care of a medical toxicologist in an observation unit. A total of 15,562 poisonings were reported to the registry during the study period, of which 340 (2.2 %) involved patients who were cared for in an observation unit. Of these patients, 22.1 % were 18 years of age or younger, and the remaining 77.9 % were greater than 18 years of age. The most common reason for exposure was the intentional ingestion of a pharmaceutical agent in both adult (30.2 %) and pediatric patients (36.0 %). Alcohols (ethanol) (24.9 %), opioids (20.0 %), and sedative-hypnotics (17.7 %) were the most common agent classes involved in adult patient exposures. The most common agent classes involved in pediatric exposures were antidepressants (12.0 %), anticonvulsants (10.7 %), and envenomations (10.7 %). In adult patients, the most common signs and symptoms involved the nervous system (52.0 %), a toxidrome (17.0 %), or a major vital sign abnormality (14.7 %). In pediatric patients, the most common signs and symptoms involved the nervous system (53.3 %), a toxidrome (21.3 %), or a major vital sign abnormality (17.3 %). The results of this study demonstrate that a wide variety of poisoned patients have been cared for in an observation unit in consultation with a board-certified medical toxicologist. Patterns for the reasons for exposure, agents responsible for the exposure, and toxicological treatments will continue to evolve. Further study is needed to identify better those poisoned patients who can be appropriately managed in an observation unit.

Indexed as

Hospital UnitsToxicologyHumansPoisoningReferral and ConsultationRegistriesRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeWatchful WaitingMedical toxicologyObservation unitsOverdosePoisoningsRegistryToxicology

Identifiers

PMID26275996
PMCPMC4781807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.