Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26275935›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2015

Memory trace replay: the shaping of memory consolidation by neuromodulation.

Laura A Atherton, David Dupret, Jack R Mellor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura A AthertonSchool of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK. Electronic address: LA.Atherton.2009@my.bristol.ac.uk.
David DupretMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit at the University of Oxford, Department of Pharmacology, Oxford, OX1 3TH, UK.
Jack R MellorSchool of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MC_UU_12024/3Wellcome Trust 101029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The consolidation of memories for places and events is thought to rely, at the network level, on the replay of spatially tuned neuronal firing patterns representing discrete places and spatial trajectories. This occurs in the hippocampal-entorhinal circuit during sharp wave ripple events (SWRs) that occur during sleep or rest. Here, we review theoretical models of lingering place cell excitability and behaviorally induced synaptic plasticity within cell assemblies to explain which sequences or places are replayed. We further provide new insights into how fluctuations in cholinergic tone during different behavioral states might shape the direction of replay and how dopaminergic release in response to novelty or reward can modulate which cell assemblies are replayed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainHumansMemory ConsolidationNeuronal Plasticityacetylcholinedopaminehippocampusreplaysharp-wave ripplessynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID26275935
PMCPMC4712256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.