Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26275908›Full record

Observational studyBMC medicine2015

Rapid microbiological screening for tuberculosis in HIV-positive patients on the first day of acute hospital admission by systematic testing of urine samples using Xpert MTB/RIF: a prospective cohort in South Africa.

Stephen D Lawn, Andrew D Kerkhoff, Rosie Burton, Charlotte Schutz, Gavin van Wyk, Monica Vogt, Pearl Pahlana, Mark P Nicol, Graeme Meintjes

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review of the number needed to screen for active TB among people living with HIV.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. XpertThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteremia in adults and children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2016
    Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation and management of TB in patients with HIV and diabetes.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen D LawnDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. stephen.lawn@lshtm.ac.uk.
Andrew D KerkhoffThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. andrewkerkhoff@gmail.com.
Rosie BurtonDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. rosie@polka.co.za.
Charlotte SchutzDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. charlottelouw@discoverymail.co.za.
Gavin van WykDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. gvw001@gmail.com.
Monica VogtThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. monica.vogt@hiv-research.org.za.
Pearl PahlanaThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. pearlpahlana@yahoo.com.
Mark P NicolDivision of Medical Microbiology and Institute for Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. mark.nicol@uct.ac.za.
Graeme MeintjesDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. graemein@mweb.co.za.
University of Cape Town · ZADesmond Tutu HIV Foundation · ZALondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M007375/1Wellcome Trust 085251Wellcome Trust 088590Wellcome Trust 098316Wellcome Trust 100714Wellcome Trust MR/M007375/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutopsy studies of HIV/AIDS-related hospital deaths in sub-Saharan Africa reveal frequent failure of pre-mortem diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB), which is found in 34-64 % of adult cadavers. We determined the overall prevalence and predictors of TB among consecutive unselected HIV-positive adults requiring acute hospital admission and the comparative diagnostic yield obtained by screening urine and sputum samples obtained on day 1 of admission with Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert).

methodsTo determine overall TB prevalence accurately, comprehensive clinical sampling (sputum, urine, blood plus other relevant samples) was done and TB was defined by detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in any sample using Xpert and/or mycobacterial liquid culture. To evaluate a rapid screening strategy, we compared the diagnostic yield of Xpert testing sputum samples and urine samples obtained with assistance from a respiratory study nurse in the first 24 h of admission.

resultsUnselected HIV-positive acute adult new medical admissions (n = 427) who were not receiving TB treatment were enrolled irrespective of clinical presentation or symptom profile. From 2,391 cultures and Xpert tests done (mean, 5.6 tests/patient) on 1,745 samples (mean, 4.1 samples/patient), TB was diagnosed in 139 patients (median CD4 cell count, 80 cells/μL). TB prevalence was very high (32.6 %; 95 % CI, 28.1-37.2 %; 139/427). However, patient symptoms and risk factors were poorly predictive for TB. Overall, ≥1 non-respiratory sample(s) tested positive in 115/139 (83 %) of all TB cases, including positive blood cultures in 41/139 (29.5 %) of TB cases. In the first 24 h of admission, sputum (spot and/or induced samples) and urine were obtainable from 37.0 % and 99.5 % of patients, respectively (P <0.001). From these, the proportions of total TB cases (n = 139) that were diagnosed by Xpert testing sputum, urine or both sputum and urine combined within the first 24 h were 39/139 (28.1 %), 89/139 (64.0 %) and 108/139 (77.7 %) cases, respectively (P <0.001).

conclusionsThe very high prevalence of active TB and its non-specific presentation strongly suggest the need for routine microbiological screening for TB in all HIV-positive medical admissions in high-burden settings. The incremental diagnostic yield from Xpert testing urine was very high and this strategy might be used to rapidly screen new admissions, especially if sputum is difficult to obtain.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsTuberculosis, PulmonaryAdultCD4 Lymphocyte CountComorbidityFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHospitalizationHumansMaleMass ScreeningMycobacterium tuberculosisPrevalenceProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID26275908
PMCPMC4537538
OpenAlexW2151009359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.