Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26275902›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2015

What interventions increase commuter cycling? A systematic review.

Glenn Stewart, Nana Kwame Anokye, Subhash Pokhrel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04035941 (The Cycle Nation Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04035941 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Cycle Nation Project: A Workplace Intervention to Increase the Number of People Cycling Regularly (Phase 2: Feasibility)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of GlasgowRan2019 to 2021Enrolled100ConditionsHealth BehaviorArmsCycle Nation Multicomponent Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Incentivizing Commuter Cycling by Financial and Non-Financial Rewards.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Individual Characteristics Associated with Active Travel in Low and High Income Groups in the UK.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  16. Cycling for health: Improving health and mitigating the climate crisis.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Glenn StewartHealth Economics Research Group (HERG), Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Nana Kwame AnokyeHealth Economics Research Group (HERG), Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Subhash PokhrelHealth Economics Research Group (HERG), Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify interventions that will increase commuter cycling.

settingAll settings where commuter cycling might take place.

participantsAdults (aged 18+) in any country.

interventionsIndividual, group or environmental interventions including policies and infrastructure. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: A wide range of 'changes in commuter cycling' indicators, including frequency of cycling, change in workforce commuting mode, change in commuting population transport mode, use of infrastructure by defined populations and population modal shift.

results12 studies from 6 countries (6 from the UK, 2 from Australia, 1 each from Sweden, Ireland, New Zealand and the USA) met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 2 studies were randomised control trials and the remainder preintervention and postintervention studies. The majority of studies (n=7) evaluated individual-based or group-based interventions and the rest environmental interventions. Individual-based or group-based interventions in 6/7 studies were found to increase commuter cycling of which the effect was significant in only 3/6 studies. Environmental interventions, however, had small but positive effects in much larger but more difficult to define populations. Almost all studies had substantial loss to follow-up.

conclusionsDespite commuter cycling prevalence varying widely between countries, robust evidence of what interventions will increase commuter cycling in low cycling prevalence nations is sparse. Wider environmental interventions that make cycling conducive appear to reach out to hard to define but larger populations. This could mean that environmental interventions, despite their small positive effects, have greater public health significance than individual-based or group-based measures because those interventions encourage a larger number of people to integrate physical activity into their everyday lives.

Indexed as

AustraliaBicyclingEnvironment DesignHealth PromotionHumansIrelandMotor ActivityNew ZealandSwedenTransportationUnited KingdomUnited Statescommuter cyclinghealth benefitslifestylePhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID26275902
PMCPMC4538250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.