Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26275841›Full record

ReviewPatient education and counseling2015

State of the science of health literacy measures: Validity implications for minority populations.

Tam H Nguyen, Hyunjeong Park, Hae-Ra Han, Kitty S Chan, Michael K Paasche-Orlow, Jolie Haun, Miyong T Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patient education and counseling, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [DNVF Memorandum Health Literacy (Part 2) - Operationalisation and Measuring of Health Literacy from a Health Services Research Perspective].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. "Was Test Designed for Africans?" Health Literacy and African Immigrants.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Medication Competence, Numeracy, and Health Literacy.Health literacy research and practice · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tam H NguyenSchool of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, USA. Electronic address: tam.nguyen@bc.edu.
Hyunjeong ParkDepartment of Nursing, Towson University, Towson, USA.
Hae-Ra HanSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Kitty S ChanSchool of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Michael K Paasche-OrlowBoston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, USA.
Jolie HaunCenter of Innovation on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, James A. Haley VA Hospital, Tampa, USA; Department of Community and Family Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA.
Miyong T KimSchool of Nursing, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.

Funding

TRAINING COREP50HL105187 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDEN, SHERITA HILL · 2010 to 2014
$9.8M
Health Literacy Intervention for Korean Americans with HPBR01HL085567 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KIM, MIYONG T · 2006 to 2010
$3.4M
Translation CoreP30NR011409 · NINR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KIM, MIYONG T · 2009 to 2012
$1.8M
Hypertension and Health Literacy in Vietnamese AmericansF31NR010992 · NINR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NGUYEN, TAM HIEU · 2010 to 2011
$81k
NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL105187NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL085567NINR NIH HHS F31 NR010992NINR NIH HHS P30 NR011409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo review the evidence supporting the validity of health literacy (HL) measures for ethnic minority populations.

methodsPubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were searched for HL measures between 1965 and 2013.

resultsA total of 109HL measures were identified; 37 were non-English HL measures and 72 were English language measures. Of the 72 English language measures, 17 did not specify the racial/ethnic characteristic of their sample. Of the remaining 55 measures, 10 (18%) did not include blacks, 30 (55%) did not include Hispanics, and 35 (64%) did not include Asians in their validation sample. When Hispanic and Asian Americans were included, they accounted for small percentages in the overall sample. Between 2005-2013, a growing number of REALM and TOFHLA translations were identified, and new HL measures for specific cultural/linguistic groups within and outside the United States were developed.

conclusionsWhile there are a growing number of new and translated HL measures for minority populations, many existing HL measures have not been properly validated for minority groups. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: HL measures that have not been properly validated for a given population should be piloted before wider use. In addition, improving HL instrument development/validation methods are imperative to increase the validity of these measures for minority populations.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyMinority HealthPsychometricReview

Identifiers

PMID26275841
PMCPMC4732928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.