Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26275529›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2016

In vivo Functional Evaluation of Increased Brain Delivery of the Opioid Peptide DAMGO by Glutathione-PEGylated Liposomes.

Annika Lindqvist, Jaap Rip, Joan van Kregten, Pieter J Gaillard, Margareta Hammarlund-Udenaes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Alzheimer's Disease: Treatment Strategies and Their Limitations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neurotheranostics as personalized medicines.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2019
    Review
  12. Peptides as drug delivery vehicles across biological barriers.Journal of pharmaceutical investigation · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annika LindqvistDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Translational PKPD Research Group, Associate member of SciLife Lab, Uppsala University, Box 591, Uppsala, SE-75124, Sweden.
Jaap Ripto-BBB technologies BV, J. H. Oortweg 19, 2333 CH, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Joan van Kregtento-BBB technologies BV, J. H. Oortweg 19, 2333 CH, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Pieter J Gaillardto-BBB technologies BV, J. H. Oortweg 19, 2333 CH, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Margareta Hammarlund-UdenaesDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Translational PKPD Research Group, Associate member of SciLife Lab, Uppsala University, Box 591, Uppsala, SE-75124, Sweden. mhu@farmbio.uu.se.
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate formulation factors causing improvement in brain delivery of a small peptide after encapsulation into a targeted nanocarrier in vivo.

methodsThe evaluation was performed in rats using microdialysis, which enabled continuous sampling of the released drug in both the brain (striatum) and blood. Uptake in brain could thereby be studied in terms of therapeutically active, released drug.

resultsWe found that encapsulation of the peptide DAMGO in fast-releasing polyethylene glycol (PEG)ylated liposomes, either with or without the specific brain targeting ligand glutathione (GSH), doubled the uptake of DAMGO into the rat brain. The increased brain delivery was observed only when the drug was encapsulated into the liposomes, thus excluding any effects of the liposomes themselves on the blood-brain barrier integrity as a possible mechanism. The addition of a GSH coating on the liposomes did not result in an additional increase in DAMGO concentrations in the brain, in contrast to earlier studies on GSH coating. This may be caused by differences in the characteristics of the encapsulated compounds and the composition of the liposome formulations.

conclusionsWe were able to show that encapsulation into PEGylated liposomes of a peptide with limited brain delivery could double the drug uptake into the brain without using a specific brain targeting ligand.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainDrug CarriersDrug CompoundingDrug Delivery SystemsEnkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-GlutathioneLiposomesMaleMicrodialysisNeostriatumPhosphatidylcholinesPolyethylene GlycolsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyDrug CarriersEnkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-GlutathioneLiposomesPhosphatidylcholinesPolyethylene Glycolsblood–brain barrierbrain deliveryliposomesmicrodialysisopioid peptide

Identifiers

PMID26275529
OpenAlexW2254204755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.