Trial reportAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2016
Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib following inadequate response to conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.
Trial report in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 9 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2B, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study To Compare 6 Dose Regimens Of CP-690,550 Vs. Placebo, Each Combined With Methotrexate, Administered For 6 Months In The Treatment Of Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Had An Inadequate Response To Methotrexate Alone
A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Active Comparator, Multicenter Study To Compare 5 Dose Regimens Of CP- 690,550 And Adalimumab Versus Placebo, Administered For 6 Months In The Treatment Of Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Confirm Dose Responsiveness Following 12 Weeks of the Administration of CP-690,550 (4 Doses) or Placebo in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Inadequately Controlled With Methotrexate Alone
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study To Confirm Dose Responsiveness Following 12 Weeks Of The Administration Of CP-690,550 (5 Doses) Or Placebo In Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Inadequately Responding To At Least 1 DMARD
Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of 2 Doses Of CP-690,550 Monotherapy In Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Phase 3 Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of 2 Doses Of CP-690,550 In Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis On Background Methotrexate
Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator, Placebo-Controlled Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of 2 Doses Of CP 690,550 In Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis On Background Methotrexate
Phase 3, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study Of The Safety And Efficacy Of 2 Doses Of CP 690,550 In Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis On Background DMARDS
Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Of The Safety And Efficacy Of 2 Doses Of CP-690,550 In Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis On Background Methotrexate With Inadequate Response To TNF Inhibitors
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of sequential biologic therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, safety, and predictive factors.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Tofacitinib Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Direct Comparison Study between Biologic-naïve and Experienced Patients.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2018Trial
- Post-marketing Surveillance of Tofacitinib in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis in Japan: A Post Hoc Analysis of Safety and Effectiveness by Prior Biologic Status.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2025Article
- Article
- JAK Inhibitors and B Cell Function: A Comparative Study of Their Impact on Plasma Cell Differentiation, Cytokine Production, and Naïve B Cell Activation.European journal of immunology · 2025Article
- Tofacitinib Safety and Effectiveness in Canadian Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis by Cardiovascular Risk Enrichment: Subanalysis of the CANTORAL Study.Rheumatology and therapy · 2024Article
- The NLRP3 Inflammasome as a Pathogenic Player Showing Therapeutic Potential in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Its Comorbidities: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Tofacitinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis by Prior Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Use: A Post Hoc Analysis.ACR open rheumatology · 2023Article
- Network-Based In Silico Analysis of New Combinations of Modern Drug Targets with Methotrexate for Response-Based Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Evolving cognition of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway: autoimmune disorders and cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- Co-Delivery of Loxoprofen and Tofacitinib by Photothermal Microneedles for Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2023Review
- Clinical scenarios-based guide for tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2023Review
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Mining social media data to investigate patient perceptions regarding DMARD pharmacotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2020Article
- Review
- Impact of Janus Kinase Inhibition with Tofacitinib on Fundamental Processes of Bone Healing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBiological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have shown diminished clinical response following an inadequate response (IR) to ≥1 previous bDMARD. Here, tofacitinib was compared with placebo in patients with an IR to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs; bDMARD-naive) and in patients with an IR to bDMARDs (bDMARD-IR).
methodsData were taken from phase II and phase III studies of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily, or placebo, as monotherapy or with background methotrexate or other csDMARDs. Efficacy endpoints and incidence rates of adverse events (AEs) of special interest were assessed.
results2812 bDMARD-naive and 705 bDMARD-IR patients were analysed. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally similar between treatment groups within subpopulations. Across subpopulations, improvements in efficacy parameters at month 3 were generally significantly greater for both tofacitinib doses versus placebo. Clinical response was numerically greater with bDMARD-naive versus bDMARD-IR patients (overlapping 95% CIs). Rates of safety events of special interest were generally similar between tofacitinib doses and subpopulations; however, patients receiving glucocorticoids had more serious AEs, discontinuations due to AEs, serious infection events and herpes zoster. Numerically greater clinical responses and incidence rates of AEs of special interest were generally reported for tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily versus tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (overlapping 95% CIs).
conclusionsTofacitinib demonstrated efficacy in both bDMARD-naive and bDMARD-IR patients with RA. Clinical response to tofacitinib was generally numerically greater in bDMARD-naive than bDMARD-IR patients. The safety profile appeared similar between subpopulations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: (NCT00413660, NCT00550446, NCT00603512, NCT00687193, NCT00960440, NCT00847613, NCT00814307, NCT00856544, NCT00853385).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.