Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26275397›Full record

ReviewTargeted oncology2016

Targeting Glioblastoma with the Use of Phytocompounds and Nanoparticles.

Francesca Pistollato, Susanne Bremer-Hoffmann, Giuseppe Basso, Sandra Sumalla Cano, Iñaki Elio, Manuel Masias Vergara, Francesca Giampieri, Maurizio Battino

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Targeted oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Francesca PistollatoOncohematology Laboratory, Department of Woman and Child Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Susanne Bremer-HoffmannNanobioscience Unit, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection (IHCP), Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, Ispra, Varese, Italy.
Giuseppe BassoOncohematology Laboratory, Department of Woman and Child Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Sandra Sumalla CanoCentre for Nutrition and Health, Universidad Europea del Atlántico (UEA), Santander, Spain.
Iñaki ElioCentre for Nutrition and Health, Universidad Europea del Atlántico (UEA), Santander, Spain.
Manuel Masias VergaraCentre for Nutrition and Health, Universidad Europea del Atlántico (UEA), Santander, Spain.
Francesca GiampieriCentre for Nutrition and Health, Universidad Europea del Atlántico (UEA), Santander, Spain. f.giampieri@univpm.it.
Maurizio BattinoCentre for Nutrition and Health, Universidad Europea del Atlántico (UEA), Santander, Spain. m.a.battino@univpm.it.
Universidad Europea del Atlántico · ESJoint Research Centre · ITUniversidad Internacional · MXUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are extremely lethal and still poorly treated primary brain tumors, characterized by the presence of highly tumorigenic cancer stem cell (CSC) subpopulations, considered responsible for tumor relapse. In order to successfully eradicate GBM growth and recurrence, new anti-cancer strategies selectively targeting CSCs should be designed. CSCs might be eradicated by targeting some of their cell surface markers and transporters, inducing their differentiation, impacting their hyper-glycolytic metabolism, inhibiting CSC-related signaling pathways and/or by targeting their microenvironmental niche. In this regard, phytocompounds such as curcumin, isothiocyanates, resveratrol and epigallocatechin-3-gallate have been shown to prevent or reverse cancer-related epigenetic dysfunctions, reducing tumorigenesis, preventing metastasis and/or increasing chemotherapy and radiotherapy efficacy. However, the actual bioavailability and metabolic processing of phytocompounds is generally unknown, and the presence of the blood brain barrier often represents a limitation to glioma treatments. Nowadays, nanoparticles (NPs) can be loaded with therapeutic compounds such as phytochemicals, improving their bioavailability and their targeted delivery within the GBM tumor bulk. Moreover, NPs can be designed to increase their tropism and specificity toward CSCs by conjugating their surface with antibodies specific for CSC antigens, with ligands or with glucose analogues. Here we discuss the use of phytochemicals as anti-glioma agents and the applicability of phytochemical-loaded NPs as drug delivery systems to target GBM. Additionally, we provide some examples on how NPs can be specifically formulated to improve CSC targeting.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsPhytotherapyAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaHumansNanoparticlesPhytochemicalsPhytochemicals

Identifiers

PMID26275397
OpenAlexW1414398267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.