Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26275165›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2015

Rule encoding in dorsal striatum impacts action selection.

Gregory B Bissonette, Matthew R Roesch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Experience-related enhancements in striatal temporal encoding.The European journal of neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017
    Article
  10. Rule Encoding in Orbitofrontal Cortex and Striatum Guides Selection.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gregory B BissonetteDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4478-652X
Matthew R RoeschDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.

Funding

Restoration and Further Assessment of the Actor-Critic Circuit and Connected Areas After Cocaine Self-AdministrationR01DA031695 · NIDA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MATTHEW R ROESCH · 2011 to 2026
$4.8M
NIDA NIH HHS DA031695NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive flexibility is a hallmark of prefrontal cortical (PFC) function yet little is known about downstream area involvement. The medial dorsal striatum (mDS) receives major projections from the PFC and is uniquely situated to perform the integration of responses with rule information. In this study, we use a novel rule shifting task in rats that mirrors non-human primate and human studies in its temporal precision and counterbalanced responses. We record activity from single neurons in the mDS while rats switch between different rules for reward. Additionally, we pharmacologically inactivate mDS by infusion of a baclofen/muscimol cocktail. Inactivation of mDS impaired the ability to shift to a new rule and increased the number of regressive errors. While recording in mDS, we identified neurons modulated by direction whose activity reflected the conflict between competing rule information. We show that a subset of these neurons was also rule selective, and that the conflict between competing rule cues was resolved as behavioural performance improved. Other neurons were modulated by rule, but not direction. These neurons became selective before behavioural performance accurately reflected the current rule. These data provide an additional locus for investigating the mechanisms underlying behavioural flexibility. Converging lines of evidence from multiple human psychiatric disorders have implicated dorsal striatum as an important and understudied neural substrate of flexible cognition. Our data confirm the importance of mDS, and suggest a mechanism by which mDS mediates abstract cognition functions.

Indexed as

RewardAction PotentialsAnimalsBaclofenCatheters, IndwellingCorpus StriatumElectrodes, ImplantedExecutive FunctionGABA-A Receptor AgonistsGABA-B Receptor AgonistsMaleMuscimolNeuronsPsychomotor PerformanceRats, Long-EvansBaclofenGABA-A Receptor AgonistsGABA-B Receptor AgonistsMuscimolattentional set-shiftingcognitive flexibilitymedial dorsal striatumratsingle unit

Identifiers

PMID26275165
PMCPMC5266529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.