Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26275160›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

The Effects of Compensatory Scanning Training on Mobility in Patients with Homonymous Visual Field Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Gera A de Haan, Bart J M Melis-Dankers, Wiebo H Brouwer, Oliver Tucha, Joost Heutink

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 38 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Occupational Therapy Interventions to Improve Reading Performance of Older Adults With Low Vision: A Systematic Review.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gera A de HaanDepartment of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Royal Dutch Visio: Centre of Expertise for Blind and Partially Sighted People, Haren, The Netherlands.
Bart J M Melis-DankersRoyal Dutch Visio: Centre of Expertise for Blind and Partially Sighted People, Haren, The Netherlands.
Wiebo H BrouwerDepartment of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Oliver TuchaDepartment of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Joost HeutinkDepartment of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Royal Dutch Visio: Centre of Expertise for Blind and Partially Sighted People, Haren, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLVisio · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHomonymous visual field defects (HVFD) are a common consequence of postchiasmatic acquired brain injury and often lead to mobility-related difficulties. Different types of compensatory scanning training have been developed, aimed at decreasing consequences of the HVFD by changing visual scanning.

aimThe aim of the present study is to examine the effects of a compensatory scanning training program using horizontal scanning on mobility-related activities and participation in daily life.

methodThe main interest of this study is to assess the effectiveness of training on mobility-related activities and participation in daily life. Visual scanning tests, such as dot counting and visual search, and control measures for visual functions and reading have been included as well. First, it is examined how performance on scanning and mobility-related measures is affected in patients with HVFD by comparing scores with scores of a healthy control group (n = 25). Second, the effect of training is assessed using an RCT design, in which performance of 26 patients before and after training is compared to performance of 23 patients in a waiting list control group.

resultsSelf-reported improvements after training were found, accompanied by improvements in detecting peripheral stimuli and avoiding obstacles during walking, especially in dual task situations in which a second task limits the attentional capacity available for compensatory scanning. Training only improved mobility-related activities in which detection of peripheral stimuli is important, while no improvement was found on tests that require other visual skills, such as reading, visual counting and visual search.

conclusionThis is the first RCT to evaluate the effects of a compensatory scanning training that is based on a systematic horizontal scanning rhythm. This training improved mobility-related activities. The results suggest that different types of compensatory scanning strategies are appropriate for different types of activities.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry ISRCTN16833414.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAdultAgedFemaleHemianopsiaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychomotor PerformanceSelf ReportTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26275160
PMCPMC4537273
OpenAlexW1884118526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.