Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26275147›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Characterization of the Intestinal Lactobacilli Community following Galactooligosaccharides and Polydextrose Supplementation in the Neonatal Piglet.

Jennifer L Hoeflinger, Dimitri O Kashtanov, Stephen B Cox, Scot E Dowd, Zeina E Jouni, Sharon M Donovan, Michael J Miller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Spatiotemporal dynamics of mucosa-associatedAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2025
    Article
  4. β-galactanase: an effective tool for the degradation of plant β-ᴅ-galactan.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer L HoeflingerDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, 905 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL, 61801, United States of America.
Dimitri O KashtanovDivision of Nutritional Sciences University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, 905 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL, 61801, United States of America.
Stephen B CoxResearch and Testing Laboratory, 4321 Marsha Sharp FWY, Lubbock, TX, 79407, United States of America.
Scot E DowdResearch and Testing Laboratory, 4321 Marsha Sharp FWY, Lubbock, TX, 79407, United States of America.
Zeina E JouniMead Johnson Nutrition, 400 West Lloyd Expressway, Evansville, IN, 47712, United States of America.
Sharon M DonovanDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, 905 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL, 61801, United States of America; Division of Nutritional Sciences University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, 905 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL, 61801, United States of America.
Michael J MillerDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, 905 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL, 61801, United States of America; Division of Nutritional Sciences University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, 905 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL, 61801, United States of America.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USMead Johnson (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, prebiotic supplementation of infant formula has become common practice; however the impact on the intestinal microbiota has not been completely elucidated. In this study, neonatal piglets were randomized to: formula (FORM, n = 8), formula supplemented with 2 g/L each galactooligosaccharides (GOS) and polydextrose (PDX, F+GP, n = 9) or a sow-reared (SOW, n = 12) reference group for 19 days. The ileal (IL) and ascending colon (AC) microbiota were characterized using culture-dependent and -independent methods. 16S amplicon sequencing identified no differences at the genera level in the IL. Interestingly, six genera in the AC were significantly different between FORM and F+GP (P<0.05): Lactobacillus, Ruminococcus, Parabacteroides, Oscillospira, Hydrogenoanaerobacterium and Catabacter. In particular, the relative abundance of AC Lactobacillus was higher (P = 0.04) in F+GP as compared to FORM. Culture-dependent analysis of the IL and AC lactobacilli communities of FORM and F+GP revealed a Lactobacillus spp. composition similar to 16S amplicon sequencing. Additional analysis demonstrated individual Lactobacillus isolates were unable to ferment PDX. Conversely, a majority of lactobacilli isolates could ferment GOS, regardless of piglet diet. In addition, the ability of lactobacilli isolates to ferment the longer chain GOS fragments (DP 3 or greater), which are expected to be present in the distal intestine, was not different between FORM and F+GP. In conclusion, prebiotic supplementation of formula impacted the AC microbiota; however, direct utilization of GOS or PDX does not lead to an increase in Lactobacillus spp.

Indexed as

AnimalsGlucansIntestinesLactobacillusOligosaccharidesPrebioticsSwineGlucansOligosaccharidespolydextrosePrebiotics

Identifiers

PMID26275147
PMCPMC4537252
OpenAlexW1773316105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.