ArticleJournal of comparative effectiveness research2015
IMPACCT Kids' Care: a real-world example of stakeholder involvement in comparative effectiveness research.
Article in Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02298361 (Innovative Methods for Parents And Clinics to Create Tools), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Innovative Methods for Parents And Clinics to Create Tools (IMPACCT) for Kids' Care
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electronic health record tools to assist with children's insurance coverage: a mixed methods study.BMC health services research · 2018Trial
- Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Article
- Designing a paediatric hospital information tool with children, parents, and healthcare staff: a UX study.BMC pediatrics · 2020Article
- Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the 'how' and 'what' of patient engagement in health research.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
- Article
- Using the electronic health record for assessment of health insurance in community health centers.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
- Innovative methods for parents and clinics to create tools for kids' care (IMPACCT Kids' Care) study protocol.Contemporary clinical trials · 2015Article
- Improve Synergy Between Health Information Exchange and Electronic Health Records to Increase Rates of Continuously Insured Patients.EGEMS (Washington, DC) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute has accelerated conversations about the importance of actively engaging stakeholders in all aspects of comparative effectiveness research (CER). Other scientific disciplines have a history of stakeholder engagement, yet few empirical examples exist of how these stakeholders can inform and enrich CER. Here we present a case study which includes the methods used to engage stakeholders, what we learned from them, and how we incorporated their ideas in a CER project. We selected stakeholders from key groups, built relationships with them and collected their feedback through interviews, observation and ongoing meetings during the four research process phases: proposal development, adapting study methods, understanding the context and information technology tool design and refinement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.