Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26274626›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurosurgical anesthesiology2016

The Neurobiology of Anesthetic Emergence.

Vijay Tarnal, Phillip E Vlisides, George A Mashour

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Use of Ketamine or Xylazine to Provide Balanced Anesthesia with Isoflurane in C57BL/6J Mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effects of Oxygen Supplementation on Injectable and Inhalant Anesthesia in C57BL/6 Mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vijay TarnalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Neuroanesthesiology, Center for Consciousness Science, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
Phillip E Vlisides
George A Mashour

Funding

Frontoparietal Mechanisms of Anesthetic-induced UnconsciousnessR01GM098578 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LEE, UNCHEOL, MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2012 to 2019
$2.4M
University of Michigan Anesthesiology Post-Doctoral Research Training ProgramT32GM103730 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Chad M Brummett, SACHIN KHETERPAL · 2014 to 2026
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098578NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM103730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving a smooth and rapid emergence from general anesthesia is of particular importance for neurosurgical patients and is a clinical goal for neuroanesthesiologists. Recent data suggest that the process of emergence is not simply the mirror image of induction, but rather controlled by distinct neural circuits. In this narrative review, we discuss (1) hysteresis, (2) the concept of neural inertia, (3) the asymmetry between the neurobiology of induction and emergence, and (4) recent attempts at actively inducing emergence.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia Recovery PeriodNeurobiologyNeurosurgical ProceduresHumansNeurons

Identifiers

PMID26274626
PMCPMC4752918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.