Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26274590›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Permeation of Therapeutic Drugs in Different Formulations across the Airway Epithelium In Vitro.

Claudia Meindl, Sandra Stranzinger, Neira Dzidic, Sharareh Salar-Behzadi, Stefan Mohr, Andreas Zimmer, Eleonore Fröhlich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Impact of mucus modulation byInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2023
    Article
  10. On the path to predicting immune responses in the lung: Modeling the pulmonary innate immune system at the air-liquid interface (ALI).European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A comparison of three mucus-secreting airway cell lines (Calu-3, SPOC1 and UNCN3T) for use as biopharmaceutical models of the nose and lung.European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A BioinspiredFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia MeindlCenter for Medical Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Sandra StranzingerResearch Center Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Neira DzidicResearch Center Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Sharareh Salar-BehzadiResearch Center Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Stefan MohrResearch Center Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Andreas ZimmerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Karl-Franzens-University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Eleonore FröhlichCenter for Medical Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Research Center Pharmaceutical Engineering (Austria) · ATMedical University of Graz · ATUniversity of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary drug delivery is characterized by short onset times of the effects and an increased therapeutic ratio compared to oral drug delivery. This delivery route can be used for local as well as for systemic absorption applying drugs as single substance or as a fixed dose combination. Drugs can be delivered as nebulized aerosols or as dry powders. A screening system able to mimic delivery by the different devices might help to assess the drug effect in the different formulations and to identify potential interference between drugs in fixed dose combinations. The present study evaluates manual devices used in animal studies for their suitability for cellular studies.

methodsCalu-3 cells were cultured submersed and in air-liquid interface culture and characterized regarding mucus production and transepithelial electrical resistance. The influence of pore size and material of the transwell membranes and of the duration of air-liquid interface culture was assessed. Compounds were applied in solution and as aerosols generated by MicroSprayer IA-1C Aerosolizer or by DP-4 Dry Powder Insufflator using fluorescein and rhodamine 123 as model compounds. Budesonide and formoterol, singly and in combination, served as examples for drugs relevant in pulmonary delivery. RESULTS AND

conclusionsMembrane material and duration of air-liquid interface culture had no marked effect on mucus production and tightness of the cell monolayer. Co-application of budesonide and formoterol, applied in solution or as aerosol, increased permeation of formoterol across cells in air-liquid interface culture. Problems with the DP-4 Dry Powder Insufflator included compound-specific delivery rates and influence on the tightness of the cell monolayer. These problems were not encountered with the MicroSprayer IA-1C Aerosolizer. The combination of Calu-3 cells and manual aerosol generation devices appears suitable to identify interactions of drugs in fixed drug combination products on permeation.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAerosolsBronchodilator AgentsBudesonideBudesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug CombinationCell MembraneCells, CulturedDrug CombinationsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEpithelial CellsEquipment DesignFluoresceinFormoterol FumarateHumansNebulizers and VaporizersRhodamine 123AerosolsBronchodilator AgentsBudesonideBudesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug CombinationDrug CombinationsFluoresceinFormoterol FumarateRhodamine 123

Identifiers

PMID26274590
PMCPMC4537286
OpenAlexW1122056798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.