Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26274585›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Adherence to the 2012 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Guidelines for Management of Gout: A Survey of Brazilian Rheumatologists.

Ana Beatriz Vargas-Santos, Geraldo da Rocha Castelar-Pinheiro, Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho, H Ralph Schumacher, Jasvinder A Singh, Naomi Schlesinger

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Beatriz Vargas-SantosDivision of Rheumatology, Internal Medicine Department, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Geraldo da Rocha Castelar-PinheiroDivision of Rheumatology, Internal Medicine Department, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Evandro Silva Freire CoutinhoEpidemiology Department, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
H Ralph SchumacherDivision of Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jasvinder A SinghMedicine Service, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America; Department of Medicine at the School of Medicine, and the Division of Epidemiology at School of Public Health, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America.
Naomi SchlesingerDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America.
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRJohnson University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the current pharmacological approach to gout treatment reported by rheumatologists in Brazil.

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional survey study using an online questionnaire e-mailed to 395 rheumatologists, randomly selected, from among the members of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology.

resultsThree hundred and nine rheumatologists (78.2%) responded to the survey. For acute gout attacks, combination therapy (NSAIDs or steroid + colchicine) was often used, even in monoarticular involvement, and colchicine was commonly started as monotherapy after 36 hours or more from onset of attack. During an acute attack, urate-lowering therapy (ULT) was withdrawn by approximately a third of rheumatologists. Anti-inflammatory prophylaxis (98% colchicine) was initiated when ULT was started in most cases (92.4%), but its duration was varied. Most (70%) respondents considered the target serum uric acid level to be less than 6 mg/dl. Approximately 50% of rheumatologists reported starting allopurinol at doses of 100 mg daily or less and 42% reported the initial dose to be 300 mg daily in patients with normal renal function. ULT was maintained indefinitely in 76% of gout patients with tophi whereas in gout patients without tophi its use was kept indefinitely in 39.6%.

conclusionThis is the first study evaluating gout treatment in a representative, random sample of Brazilian rheumatologists describing common treatment practices among these specialists. We identified several gaps in reported gout management, mainly concerning the use of colchicine and ULT and the duration of anti-inflammatory prophylaxis and ULT. Since rheumatologists are considered as opinion leaders in this disease, a program for improving quality of care for gout patients should focus on increasing their knowledge in this common disease.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAllopurinolAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBrazilColchicineDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGoutHumansMaleMiddle AgedRheumatologySocieties, MedicalAllopurinolAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalColchicine

Identifiers

PMID26274585
PMCPMC4537114
OpenAlexW1838435046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.