Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26273838›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Cleanroom Maintenance Significantly Reduces Abundance but Not Diversity of Indoor Microbiomes.

Alexander Mahnert, Parag Vaishampayan, Alexander J Probst, Anna Auerbach, Christine Moissl-Eichinger, Kasthuri Venkateswaran, Gabriele Berg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetic Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander MahnertInstitute of Environmental Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria; Biotechnology and Planetary Protection Group, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, United States of America.
Parag VaishampayanBiotechnology and Planetary Protection Group, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, United States of America.
Alexander J ProbstDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Anna AuerbachInstitute for Microbiology and Archaea Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Christine Moissl-EichingerInstitute for Microbiology and Archaea Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Medical University Graz, Department of Internal Medicine, Graz, Austria; BioTechMed Graz, Graz, Austria.
Kasthuri VenkateswaranBiotechnology and Planetary Protection Group, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, United States of America.
Gabriele BergInstitute of Environmental Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cleanrooms have been considered microbially-reduced environments and are used to protect human health and industrial product assembly. However, recent analyses have deciphered a rather broad diversity of microbes in cleanrooms, whose origin as well as physiological status has not been fully understood. Here, we examined the input of intact microbial cells from a surrounding built environment into a spacecraft assembly cleanroom by applying a molecular viability assay based on propidium monoazide (PMA). The controlled cleanroom (CCR) was characterized by ~6.2*103 16S rRNA gene copies of intact bacterial cells per m2 floor surface, which only represented 1% of the total community that could be captured via molecular assays without viability marker. This was in contrast to the uncontrolled adjoining facility (UAF) that had 12 times more living bacteria. Regarding diversity measures retrieved from 16S rRNA Illumina-tag analyzes, we observed, however, only a minor drop in the cleanroom facility allowing the conclusion that the number but not the diversity of microbes is strongly affected by cleaning procedures. Network analyses allowed tracking a substantial input of living microbes to the cleanroom and a potential enrichment of survival specialists like bacterial spore formers and archaeal halophiles and mesophiles. Moreover, the cleanroom harbored a unique community including 11 exclusive genera, e.g., Haloferax and Sporosarcina, which are herein suggested as indicators of cleanroom environments. In sum, our findings provide evidence that archaea are alive in cleanrooms and that cleaning efforts and cleanroom maintenance substantially decrease the number but not the diversity of indoor microbiomes.

Indexed as

Environment, ControlledMaintenanceMicrobiotaArchaeaAzidesBacteriaBiodiversityColony Count, MicrobialGenetic VariationHumansMicrobial ViabilityPhylogenyPropidiumRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAzidesPropidiumpropidium monoazideRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26273838
PMCPMC4537314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.