ArticlePloS one2015
Comprehensive Analysis of the 16p11.2 Deletion and Null Cntnap2 Mouse Models of Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.
- Auditory processing in rodent models of autism: a systematic review.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- Reduced dorsal CA1 activity limits retention of the temporal component of declarative memory in theeLife · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Lead exposure's link to autism-like behavior and Shank 3 gene expression in C57BL/6J mice.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2026Article
- Cerebellar microRNA-206 tunes Purkinje neuron firing dynamics to control sensorimotor gating.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Analysis of Gene, Environment, and Sex Interaction in the Development of Autistic-like Phenotype in Mice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- SEZ6L2 Loss Disrupts Motor Coordination, Cognitive Function, and Synaptic Connectivity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Developmental Disturbances in Animal Models of Autism Spectrum Disorder.Developmental neurobiology · 2025Review
- Review
- Use of a predictor cue during a speech sound discrimination task in a Cntnap2 knockout rat model of autism.PloS one · 2025Article
- Role of Odor Novelty on Olfactory Issues in Autism Spectrum Disorder.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2024Review
- Animal Models of Autistic-like Behavior in Rodents: A Scoping Review and Call for a Comprehensive Scoring System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Degraded tactile coding in the Cntnap2 mouse model of autism.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Dissecting 16p11.2 hemi-deletion to study sex-specific striatal phenotypes of neurodevelopmental disorders.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Article
- Understanding copy number variations through their genes: a molecular view on 16p11.2 deletion and duplication syndromes.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Article
- Characterizing maternal isolation-induced ultrasonic vocalizations in a gene-environment interaction rat model for autism.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2023Article
- 16p11.2 deletion mice exhibit compromised fronto-temporal connectivity, GABAergic dysfunction, and enhanced attentional ability.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Critical periods and Autism Spectrum Disorders, a role for sleep.Neurobiology of sleep and circadian rhythms · 2023Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder comprises several neurodevelopmental conditions presenting symptoms in social communication and restricted, repetitive behaviors. A major roadblock for drug development for autism is the lack of robust behavioral signatures predictive of clinical efficacy. To address this issue, we further characterized, in a uniform and rigorous way, mouse models of autism that are of interest because of their construct validity and wide availability to the scientific community. We implemented a broad behavioral battery that included but was not restricted to core autism domains, with the goal of identifying robust, reliable phenotypes amenable for further testing. Here we describe comprehensive findings from two known mouse models of autism, obtained at different developmental stages, using a systematic behavioral test battery combining standard tests as well as novel, quantitative, computer-vision based systems. The first mouse model recapitulates a deletion in human chromosome 16p11.2, found in 1% of individuals with autism. The second mouse model harbors homozygous null mutations in Cntnap2, associated with autism and Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome. Consistent with previous results, 16p11.2 heterozygous null mice, also known as Del(7Slx1b-Sept1)4Aam weighed less than wild type littermates displayed hyperactivity and no social deficits. Cntnap2 homozygous null mice were also hyperactive, froze less during testing, showed a mild gait phenotype and deficits in the three-chamber social preference test, although less robust than previously published. In the open field test with exposure to urine of an estrous female, however, the Cntnap2 null mice showed reduced vocalizations. In addition, Cntnap2 null mice performed slightly better in a cognitive procedural learning test. Although finding and replicating robust behavioral phenotypes in animal models is a challenging task, such functional readouts remain important in the development of therapeutics and we anticipate both our positive and negative findings will be utilized as a resource for the broader scientific community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.