ArticlePloS one2015
Identification of Adverse Drug Events from Free Text Electronic Patient Records and Information in a Large Mental Health Case Register.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing in Mental Health: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Analytical approaches for medication management for patient safety: a scoping review.npj health systems · 2025Article
- Applying text-mining to clinical notes: the identification of patient characteristics from electronic health records (EHRs).BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Nursing Practice: An Integrative Review.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Review
- The Effects of CYP2C19 Genotype on Proxies of SSRI Antidepressant Response in the UK Biobank.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Automatic Detection of Adverse Drug Events in Geriatric Care: Study Proposal.JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
- Development of a Pipeline for Adverse Drug Reaction Identification in Clinical Notes: Word Embedding Models and String Matching.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- A narrative review on the validity of electronic health record-based research in epidemiology.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Review
- Article
- Cognitive Impairments in Schizophrenia: A Study in a Large Clinical Sample Using Natural Language Processing.Frontiers in digital health · 2021Article
- Prevalence of Mental Illnesses in Domestic Violence Police Records: Text Mining Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Toward the Development of Data Governance Standards for Using Clinical Free-Text Data in Health Research: Position Paper.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Automation Opportunities in Pharmacovigilance: An Industry Survey.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2020Article
- A compound attributes-based predictive model for drug induced liver injury in humans.PloS one · 2020Article
- Exploring association between certified EHRs adoption and patient experience in U.S. psychiatric hospitals.PloS one · 2020Article
- Hospital Characteristics Associated with Certified EHR Adoption among US Psychiatric Hospitals.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2020Article
- Towards Personalized Antithrombotic Treatments: Focus on P2YClinical pharmacokinetics · 2019Review
- Use of Natural Language Processing to identify Obsessive Compulsive Symptoms in patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Extraction of Geriatric Syndromes From Electronic Health Record Clinical Notes: Assessment of Statistical Natural Language Processing Methods.JMIR medical informatics · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesElectronic healthcare records (EHRs) are a rich source of information, with huge potential for secondary research use. The aim of this study was to develop an application to identify instances of Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) from free text psychiatric EHRs.
methodsWe used the GATE Natural Language Processing (NLP) software to mine instances of ADEs from free text content within the Clinical Record Interactive Search (CRIS) system, a de-identified psychiatric case register developed at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK. The tool was built around a set of four movement disorders (extrapyramidal side effects [EPSEs]) related to antipsychotic therapy and rules were then generalised such that the tool could be applied to additional ADEs. We report the frequencies of recorded EPSEs in patients diagnosed with a Severe Mental Illness (SMI) and then report performance in identifying eight other unrelated ADEs.
resultsThe tool identified EPSEs with >0.85 precision and >0.86 recall during testing. Akathisia was found to be the most prevalent EPSE overall and occurred in the Asian ethnic group with a frequency of 8.13%. The tool performed well when applied to most of the non-EPSEs but least well when applied to rare conditions such as myocarditis, a condition that appears frequently in the text as a side effect warning to patients.
conclusionsThe developed tool allows us to accurately identify instances of a potential ADE from psychiatric EHRs. As such, we were able to study the prevalence of ADEs within subgroups of patients stratified by SMI diagnosis, gender, age and ethnicity. In addition we demonstrated the generalisability of the application to other ADE types by producing a high precision rate on a non-EPSE related set of ADE containing documents. AVAILABILITY: The application can be found at http://git.brc.iop.kcl.ac.uk/rmallah/dystoniaml.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.