Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26273682›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology research2015

Polyclonal Recipient nTregs Are Superior to Donor or Third-Party Tregs in the Induction of Transplantation Tolerance.

Nina Pilat, Christoph Klaus, Karin Hock, Ulrike Baranyi, Lukas Unger, Benedikt Mahr, Andreas M Farkas, Fritz Wrba, Thomas Wekerle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nina PilatSection of Transplantation Immunology, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Christoph KlausSection of Transplantation Immunology, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Karin HockSection of Transplantation Immunology, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Ulrike BaranyiSection of Transplantation Immunology, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Lukas UngerSection of Transplantation Immunology, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Benedikt MahrSection of Transplantation Immunology, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Andreas M FarkasSection of Transplantation Immunology, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Fritz WrbaInstitute of Clinical Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Thomas WekerleSection of Transplantation Immunology, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF TRP 151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induction of donor-specific tolerance is still considered as the "Holy Grail" in transplantation medicine. The mixed chimerism approach is virtually the only tolerance approach that was successfully translated into the clinical setting. We have previously reported successful induction of chimerism and tolerance using cell therapy with recipient T regulatory cells (Tregs) to avoid cytotoxic recipient treatment. Treg therapy is limited by the availability of cells as large-scale expansion is time-consuming and associated with the risk of contamination with effector cells. Using a costimulation-blockade based bone marrow (BM) transplantation (BMT) model with Treg therapy instead of cytoreductive recipient treatment we aimed to determine the most potent Treg population for clinical translation. Here we show that CD4(+)CD25(+) in vitro activated nTregs are superior to TGFβ induced iTregs in promoting the induction of chimerism and tolerance. Therapy with nTregs (but not iTregs) led to multilineage chimerism and donor-specific tolerance in mice receiving as few as 0.5 × 10(6) cells. Moreover, we show that only recipient Tregs, but not donor or third-party Tregs, had a beneficial effect on BM engraftment at the tested doses. Thus, recipient-type nTregs significantly improve chimerism and tolerance and might be the most potent Treg population for translation into the clinical setting.

Indexed as

Tissue DonorsTransplant RecipientsAnimalsBone Marrow TransplantationFemaleGraft SurvivalIsoantibodiesMiceSkin TransplantationT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryTransplantation ChimeraTransplantation ToleranceIsoantibodies

Identifiers

PMID26273682
PMCPMC4530277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.