Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26273567›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2015

Online prevention of postpartum depression for Spanish- and English-speaking pregnant women: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Alinne Z Barrera, Robert E Wickham, Ricardo F Muñoz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Getting It "Right".Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2016
    Trial
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alinne Z BarreraPalo Alto University, Palo Alto, California, USA ; Institute for International Internet Interventions for Health (i4Health), Palo Alto, California, USA.
Robert E WickhamPalo Alto University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Ricardo F MuñozPalo Alto University, Palo Alto, California, USA ; Institute for International Internet Interventions for Health (i4Health), Palo Alto, California, USA.
Palo Alto University · US

Funding

Using the Internet Randomized Trials for Post-Partum DepressionF32MH077371 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BARRERA, ALINNE Z · 2006 to 2009
$123k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH077371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostpartum depression (PPD) is a maternal mental health problem that affects women from all regions of the world. Unfortunately, even in developed countries, half of the cases go undetected and, consequently, untreated. Individuals from low and middle income countries trend toward underutilization of mental health services, partly due to the limited number of available psychological resources. The primary aims of this pilot randomized controlled trial were to adapt to the Internet the Mothers and Babies Course/

methodsPregnant women, 18 years or older who were interested in using the site for themselves were recruited and randomly assigned to a fully-automated self-help Internet intervention or to an information-only control condition. Randomized participants were invited to complete monthly depression assessments up to six months postpartum. To examine the prevention effects of the Internet intervention, pregnant women who did not meet current criteria for a major depressive episode, who engaged with the study website, and who provided depression data during the postpartum follow-up period were included in the study analyses.

resultsParticipants were 111 predominantly Spanish-speaking (82.9%) and Latino/Hispanic (71.3%) pregnant women residing in 23 countries worldwide. The effect of the prevention intervention condition failed to reach significance at the a priori alpha-level. However, the observed coefficient trended in the hypothesized direction (

conclusionsThis study provides preliminary evidence that Internet interventions are a promising method toward expanding the reach of psychological resources to perinatal women at-risk for PPD.

Indexed as

global mental healthInternet interventionPostpartum depressionpreventionSpanish-speakingwomen

Identifiers

PMID26273567
PMCPMC4530522
OpenAlexW1891709998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.