Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26273535›Full record

ReviewBone research2015

Disruption of bone and skeletal muscle in severe burns.

Gordon L Klein

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bone research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Musculoskeletal Issues in Pediatric Burn Patients.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. [Changes in the related indicators of bone formation and bone resorption in severely burned rats].Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Collocated burn and fracture injuries in major trauma: a 10 year experience.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2020
    Article
  14. Anabolic and anticatabolic agents used in burn care: What is known and what is yet to be learned.Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2020
    Review
  15. Risk of osteoporosis and fracture in victims with burn injury.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. The Long-Term Impact of Severe Burn Trauma on Musculoskeletal Health.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2018
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gordon L KleinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Medical Branch and Shriners Hospitals for Children , Galveston, TX, USA.
Shriners Hospitals for Children - Galveston · US

Funding

Project 9: The role of androgen/corticosteroid in fat, muscle and glucose metabolism of burn victimsP50GM060338 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI SZABO, CSABA · 2000 to 2017
$24.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM060338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe burn injury triggers the body's nonspecific adaptive responses to acute insult, including the systemic inflammatory and stress responses, as well as the sympathetic response to immobilization. These responses trigger inflammatory bone resorption followed by glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis of osteoblasts and probably osteocytes. Because these patients are catabolic, they suffer concomitant muscle wasting and negative nitrogen balance. The use of anabolic agents such as recombinant human growth hormone and oxandrolone results in improved bone mineral content and muscle strength after approximately 1 year. Use of bisphosphonates within the first 10 days of a severe burn completely blocks the resorptive bone loss and has the added advantage of appearing to preserve muscle protein from excessive breakdown. The mechanism for the protective effect on muscle is not currently known. However, if the effect of bisphosphonates on muscle can be confirmed, it raises the possibility that bone communicates with muscle.

Identifiers

PMID26273535
PMCPMC4472150
OpenAlexW2101418979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.