Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26273201›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2015

Shared decision-making in the People's Republic of China: current status and future directions.

Rongchong Huang, Michael R Gionfriddo, Lizhi Zhang, Aaron L Leppin, Henry H Ting, Victor M Montori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rongchong HuangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
Michael R GionfriddoKnowledge and Evaluation Research Unit and Mayo Graduate School, The University Hospital for Columbia and Cornell, New York, NY, USA.
Lizhi ZhangDivision of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, The University Hospital for Columbia and Cornell, New York, NY, USA.
Aaron L LeppinKnowledge and Evaluation Research Unit and Mayo Graduate School, The University Hospital for Columbia and Cornell, New York, NY, USA.
Henry H TingNew York-Presbyterian Hospital and Healthcare System, The University Hospital for Columbia and Cornell, New York, NY, USA.
Victor M MontoriKnowledge and Evaluation Research Unit and Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesTL1TR000137 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere insufficiencies in the supply and inequities in the distribution of health care professionals, facilities, and services create conditions for limited quality of care and lack of trust - even violent conflict - between clinicians and patients in the People's Republic of China. Alongside structural reform, shared decision-making (SDM) may help meet the needs and advance the goals of each patient. Little is known, however, about the realities and opportunities for SDM in the People's Republic of China.

methodsTo identify reports of SDM in the People's Republic of China, we used multiple sources, including: several databases, searched in English and Chinese, online journals, and clinical trial registries. In addition, we contacted experts in the field to identify any articles missed through our other search strategies. We included all trials and surveys reporting on SDM in Chinese patients. We summarized these studies by describing them with particular attention to reports of patient decisional preference and of the impact of SDM interventions on outcomes in Chinese patients.

resultsWe identified five surveys examining patient preference for SDM and nine studies examining constructs related to SDM in Chinese patients, but none involving patients in Mainland China. We could not find any reports of development, testing, or implementation of SDM tools for patients in Mainland China.

conclusionThe research on SDM in the People's Republic of China is limited, with almost no direct evidence to inform clinical policies or implementation. Although multiple barriers are apparent, the value of implementing, testing, and disseminating effective SDM in the People's Republic of China in terms of patient experience and outcomes demands urgent realization.

Indexed as

patient-centered careshared decision-makingthe People’s Republic of China

Identifiers

PMID26273201
PMCPMC4532212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.