Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26272808›Full record

ReviewJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2015

Nanoparticles for Cardiovascular Imaging and Therapeutic Delivery, Part 1: Compositions and Features.

John C Stendahl, Albert J Sinusas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PET imaging of macrophages in cardiovascular diseases.American journal of translational research · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Molecular Imaging of the Heart.Comprehensive Physiology · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Molecular Imaging in Drug Discovery and Development.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John C StendahlSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut Yale Translational Research Imaging Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; and.
Albert J SinusasSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut Yale Translational Research Imaging Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut albert.sinusas@yale.edu.

Funding

q4DE: A Biomarker for Image-Guided, Post-MI Hydrogel TherapyR01HL121226 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DUNCAN, JAMES S, O'DONNELL, MATTHEW · 2014 to 2022
$6.3M
Training In Multi-modality Molecular & Translational Cardiovascular ImagingT32HL098069 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JAMES S DUNCAN, Georges El Fakhri · 2010 to 2026
$5.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL121226NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging agents made from nanoparticles are functionally versatile and have unique properties that may translate to clinical utility in several key cardiovascular imaging niches. Nanoparticles exhibit size-based circulation, biodistribution, and elimination properties different from those of small molecules and microparticles. In addition, nanoparticles provide versatile platforms that can be engineered to create both multimodal and multifunctional imaging agents with tunable properties. With these features, nanoparticulate imaging agents can facilitate fusion of high-sensitivity and high-resolution imaging modalities and selectively bind tissues for targeted molecular imaging and therapeutic delivery. Despite their intriguing attributes, nanoparticulate imaging agents have thus far achieved only limited clinical use. The reasons for this restricted advancement include an evolving scope of applications, the simplicity and effectiveness of existing small-molecule agents, pharmacokinetic limitations, safety concerns, and a complex regulatory environment. This review describes general features of nanoparticulate imaging agents and therapeutics and discusses challenges associated with clinical translation. A second, related review to appear in a subsequent issue of JNM highlights nuclear-based nanoparticulate probes in preclinical cardiovascular imaging.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsNanoparticlesCardiovascular SystemHumansMolecular ImagingMultimodal ImagingParticle SizeRadionuclide ImagingRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiopharmaceuticalscardiovascular diseasemolecular imagingnanoparticlesnuclear imagingtheranostics

Identifiers

PMID26272808
PMCPMC4934895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.