Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26272717›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015

Assessing Recent Selection and Functionality at Long Noncoding RNA Loci in the Mouse Genome.

R Axel W Wiberg, Daniel L Halligan, Rob W Ness, Anamaria Necsulea, Henrik Kaessmann, Peter D Keightley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. LncRNAs in domesticated animals: from dog to livestock species.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Immunobiology of Long Noncoding RNAs.Annual review of immunology · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

R Axel W WibergInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom Present address: Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, United Kingdom raww@st-andrews.ac.uk.
Daniel L HalliganInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Rob W NessInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Anamaria NecsuleaSchool of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Henrik KaessmannCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Peter D KeightleyInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
University of Edinburgh · GBÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are one of the most intensively studied groups of noncoding elements. Debate continues over what proportion of lncRNAs are functional or merely represent transcriptional noise. Although characterization of individual lncRNAs has identified approximately 200 functional loci across the Eukarya, general surveys have found only modest or no evidence of long-term evolutionary conservation. Although this lack of conservation suggests that most lncRNAs are nonfunctional, the possibility remains that some represent recent evolutionary innovations. We examine recent selection pressures acting on lncRNAs in mouse populations. We compare patterns of within-species nucleotide variation at approximately 10,000 lncRNA loci in a cohort of the wild house mouse, Mus musculus castaneus, with between-species nucleotide divergence from the rat (Rattus norvegicus). Loci under selective constraint are expected to show reduced nucleotide diversity and divergence. We find limited evidence of sequence conservation compared with putatively neutrally evolving ancestral repeats (ARs). Comparisons of sequence diversity and divergence between ARs, protein-coding (PC) exons and lncRNAs, and the associated flanking regions, show weak, but significantly lower levels of sequence diversity and divergence at lncRNAs compared with ARs. lncRNAs conserved deep in the vertebrate phylogeny show lower within-species sequence diversity than lncRNAs in general. A set of 74 functionally characterized lncRNAs show levels of diversity and divergence comparable to PC exons, suggesting that these lncRNAs are under substantial selective constraints. Our results suggest that, in mouse populations, most lncRNA loci evolve at rates similar to ARs, whereas older lncRNAs tend to show signals of selection similar to PC genes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularSelection, GeneticAnimalsGenetic LociGenetic VariationGenomeMiceRatsRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Long Noncodingfunctionalitygenomicslong noncoding RNAsselection

Identifiers

PMID26272717
PMCPMC4558870
OpenAlexW2121306035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.